“M\u00e1s rud \u00e9 nach bhfuil s\u00e9 ag iarraidh sin a tharl\u00f3idh, c\u00e9n f\u00e1th a chur go crann i l\u00e1r an ghaird\u00edn – agus n\u00ed taobh amuigh de na balla\u00ed na Paradise *” A chinneadh Veronika a Die, Paulo Coelho. Do Mari, carachtar san \u00farsc\u00e9al ‘A chinneadh Veronika a Die’, an scr\u00edbhneoir Paulo Coelho, ba d\u00edbirt \u00f3 Ghaird\u00edn na Eden an l\u00e1n\u00fain treallach agus gan bonn dl\u00edthi\u00fail “… ach le haghaidh briseadh an dl\u00ed treallach, gan aon fhoras dl\u00edthi\u00fail ithe tortha\u00ed ar maith agus olc “Ditto. Mar sin f\u00e9in, is f\u00e9idir leis an gceist thuas a fhoirmli\u00fa gan eagla aon phion\u00f3is, n\u00f3 at\u00e1 cion ina sacrilege n\u00f3 blasphemy. Aidhm a fh\u00e1il amach c\u00e9n f\u00e1th a chur Dia an crann an eolas maith agus olc i measc an ghaird\u00edn gan aon bhac a cosc ar an fear a rochtain a fh\u00e1il air, \u00e1fach, comhairle maith a thabhairt faoi deara go bhfuil an gn\u00edomh a iarraidh ceist, agus ag brath ar a iarrann an cheist is f\u00e9idir, teach an chuid is m\u00f3 \u00e9ags\u00fail i n-intinn bulge.<\/p>\n
N\u00edor ch\u00f3ir an cheist seo a dh\u00e9anamh ach tr\u00ed atheists, skeptics, magicians, spiritualists, agus sruthanna eile smaointeoir\u00ed secular, ach n\u00ed m\u00f3r \u00e9 a dh\u00e9anamh go pr\u00edomha ag Cr\u00edostaithe. N\u00ed f\u00e9idir liom a chialla\u00edonn ‘Cr\u00edostaithe’ le fulcrum tr\u00ed reiligi\u00fan, mhor\u00e1ltacht, n\u00e1 aon fhoirmi\u00falacht, ach iad si\u00fad a chreideann i nd\u00e1ir\u00edre an fhoirceadal Chr\u00edost.<\/p>\n
Is f\u00e9idir an cheist a chur le ch\u00e9ile gan eagla aon phion\u00f3is, n\u00f3 at\u00e1 cion ina sacrilege n\u00f3 blasphemy. Aidhm a fh\u00e1il amach c\u00e9n f\u00e1th a chur Dia an crann an eolas maith agus olc i measc an ghaird\u00edn gan aon bhac a cosc ar an fear a rochtain a fh\u00e1il air.<\/p>\n
Ach t\u00e1 s\u00e9 ciallmhar a thabhairt faoi deara go bhfuil an gn\u00edomh a iarraidh ceist, agus ag brath ar a iarrann an cheist is f\u00e9idir, teach an chuid is m\u00f3 \u00e9ags\u00fail i n-intinn bulge.<\/p>\n
Chun tuiscint a fh\u00e1il peculiarity seo ceisteanna f\u00e9in, in i\u00fal d\u00fainn ar ais chuig an \u00f3c\u00e1id i Eden:<\/p>\n
An ’nathair’ iarr ceist ar an bhean, “An bhfuil Dia d\u00fairt go deimhin, ’n\u00ed bheidh t\u00fa ag ithe ar gach crann an ghaird\u00edn”<\/span> (Gen. 3: 1). An ’nathair’ ag iarraidh a fhios acu, n\u00f3 a cheisti\u00fa ar an ordan\u00e1s Dhiaga? Cad dearcadh spreagtha an ceistitheoir?<\/p>\n F\u00f3gra cad a d’fh\u00e9adfadh an ’nathair’ cunning leis an gceist a chur l\u00e9i,<\/p>\n Is \u00ed an cheist, ‘C\u00e9n f\u00e1th go raibh Dia a chur ar an crann i l\u00e1r an ghaird\u00edn’ \u00e1bhartha agus n\u00ed m\u00f3r a dh\u00e9anamh nuair a bhfuil t\u00fa an fonn a fhios, \u00e1fach, ag brath ar an chomhth\u00e9acs, n\u00f3 an t-am a dh\u00e9anta, a \u00fas\u00e1id chun flatten. Tabhair faoi deara:<\/p>\n “M\u00e1s rud \u00e9 nach bhfuil s\u00e9 ag iarraidh sin a tharl\u00f3idh, c\u00e9n f\u00e1th a chur go crann i l\u00e1r an ghaird\u00edn – agus n\u00ed taobh amuigh de na balla\u00ed na Paradise *”<\/span><\/em> A chinneadh Veronika a Die, Paulo Coelho, S\u00e3o Paulo, Foilsitheoir Earth Bhrasa\u00edl, 2006, Leathanach 108. .<\/p>\n Nuair a bh\u00edonn Le ceisteanna mar seo amh\u00e1in Moltar go maith a sheice\u00e1il cad \u00e9 an spreagadh taobh thiar de:<\/p>\n Tagra\u00edonn pointe eile a chur san \u00e1ireamh ar an staid mhoth\u00fach\u00e1nach an ceistitheoir.<\/p>\n Ba ch\u00f3ir go mbeadh an cheist ar an sc\u00e1ile\u00e1n a dh\u00e9anamh, \u00e1fach, n\u00edor ch\u00f3ir duine disown s\u00e9 ach an chuimhneach\u00e1in \u00e9agothroime mhoth\u00fach\u00e1nach. C\u00e9n f\u00e1th a cheisti\u00fa divinity c\u00faiseanna ach amh\u00e1in nuair nach bhfuil t\u00fa go maith as, nuair a chailleann t\u00fa gaol, nuair a thagann s\u00e9 amach as caidreamh frustrating, nuair depressed, nuair i mb\u00e1sanna, tubaist\u00ed, etc?<\/p>\n M\u00e1s mian leis an ceistitheoir a fh\u00e1il chun an fh\u00edrinne nach f\u00e9idir iad a chur i mbaol emotionally.<\/p>\n T\u00e1 s\u00e9 ar eolas go bhfuil an eola\u00edocht nua-aimseartha ar cheann de na fadhbanna an uirlis, is \u00e9 an uirlis anail\u00edseach imeachta\u00ed eola\u00edochta \u00e1irithe. Conas chun anail\u00eds a dh\u00e9anamh adamh gan an uirlis anail\u00edse isteach an dinimic an adaimh? M\u00e1 anail\u00eds ag an micreasc\u00f3p, an solas f\u00e9in jutting isteach sa adamh N\u00ed chuirfidh s\u00e9 isteach ar an m\u00e9id at\u00e1 ag breathn\u00fa, cur isteach ar an tomhais agus diagn\u00f3is? De r\u00e9ir a thabhairt isteach ruaimeanna \u00e1irithe i gcealla chun \u00e9 a fheice\u00e1il, n\u00e1 cur isteach ar an dinimic a comhdh\u00faile?<\/p>\n Beidh siad ag r\u00e1 anail\u00eds a bhraitheann go hioml\u00e1n ar an gcaidreamh loighci\u00fail, is \u00e9 an duine at\u00e1 ag lorg freagra tiomanta emotionally? M\u00e1 t\u00e1 na ceisteanna, an bonn Le haghaidh aon chuardach eolais, beset cheana f\u00e9in Le teacht chun cinn gn\u00e9ithe claonta?<\/p>\n Leanann s\u00e9 go, m\u00e1 t\u00e1 duine gcont\u00fairt emotionally, cloisfidh t\u00fa ach cad ba mhaith leat a chloiste\u00e1il, agus a fheice\u00e1il ach amh\u00e1in cad ba mhaith leat a fheice\u00e1il. D\u00e1 bhr\u00ed sin, \u201cn\u00ed m\u00f3r d\u00fainn r\u00e1iteas f\u00edor an r\u00e1 t\u00f3ir: \u201c. T\u00e1 an dall si\u00fad nach \u201cmbeidh a fheice\u00e1il\u201d<\/p>\n \u00d3s rud \u00e9 go d’iarr an diabhal an cheist chun an bhean, “An bhfuil Dia d\u00fairt go deimhin,” N\u00ed bheidh t\u00fa a ithe ar gach crann an ghaird\u00edn “(Gen. 3: 1), ag cur b\u00e9ime cosc nach raibh go h\u00e9ifeachtach ann, go leor smaointeoir\u00ed \u00e9isteacht amh\u00e1in agus a fheice\u00e1il ar an ordan\u00e1s Dia thug fear cosc. Fi\u00fa amh\u00e1in c\u00faisigh Dia a chur faoi deara an fear a disobedience, n\u00f3 go chum Dia an pion\u00f3s.<\/p>\n Ach cad a d\u00fairt Dia a fear? An bhfuil atheists a l\u00e9amh an m\u00e9id a d\u00fairt Dia? An bhfuil na l\u00e9irmheast\u00f3ir\u00ed oscailt agus a l\u00e9amh go h\u00e9ifeachtach leis an leabhar a bhfuil na taifid ar cad a d\u00fairt Dia?<\/p>\n F\u00f3gra cad a d\u00fairt Dia, “As gach crann an ghaird\u00edn mayest thou shaoirse a ithe …”<\/span> (Gein 2:16). Cad Dia b\u00e9im? Dia b\u00e9im go raibh an fear saor in aisce, agus d’fh\u00e9adfadh s\u00e9 feidhmi\u00fa ag toil. D’fh\u00e9adfadh Adam ithe faoi shaoirse ar gach crann an ghaird\u00edn, \u00e1fach, b\u00e9im ar an ’nathair’ an bhean ach cosc.<\/p>\n T\u00e1 s\u00e9 iontas go in aon ch\u00faiseamh i gcoinne Dia cite chuid focal mar at\u00e1 taifeadta i Genesis, go h\u00e1irithe, “As gach crann an ghaird\u00edn thou mayest shaoirse a ithe …”<\/span> (Gein 2:16). De ghn\u00e1th lip\u00e9adaigh na tortha\u00ed ar an eolas maith agus olc crann amh\u00e1in ‘tortha\u00ed forbidden’. Agus na tortha\u00ed go bhfuil riamh ‘toirmeasc’ mar gheall ar na crainn a d’fh\u00e9adfadh fear a ithe ‘faoi shaoirse’.<\/p>\n Ionducht\u00fa ’nathair’ doil\u00e9ir an fh\u00edrinne d\u00f3ibh si\u00fad a ghlacadh delight i l\u00e9iri\u00fa go maith leo a gcro\u00ed. M\u00edcheart a ch\u00f3nascadh ar an gceist claonta ar ’nathair’ ordan\u00e1s Dhiaga, agus a l\u00e9irmh\u00edni\u00fa s\u00e9 ach mar toirmeasc. Bhuel an preacher d\u00fairt: “T\u00e1 an amad\u00e1n N\u00edl aon delight i eagna, ach amh\u00e1in chun a l\u00e9iri\u00fa cad \u00e1thais do chro\u00ed”<\/span> (Seanfhocal 18: 2).<\/p>\n Cad at\u00e1 le feice\u00e1il sa ordan\u00e1s Dhiaga? Dia a thabhairt Adam feidhmi\u00fa bheidh saor in aisce!<\/p>\n Dia a chur ar an crann an eolas maith agus olc i measc an ghaird\u00edn, gan aon bhac a chosc fear a ithe ar chuid tortha\u00ed a thabhairt duit saoirse.<\/p>\n M\u00e1s rud \u00e9 nach raibh an crann ar eolas maith agus olc a chur i measc na crainn eile Eden, bh\u00ed Adam h\u00e9ifeachtach saor in aisce? T\u00e1 saoirse nuair nach bhfuil aon teorainneacha? Conas saoirse a dhearadh gan tagairt bunaithe?<\/p>\n N\u00edl aon teorainneacha do Dhia? Tuigtear go bhfuil Dia saor in aisce, ach n\u00ed f\u00e9idir s\u00e9 br\u00e9ag. N\u00ed f\u00e9idir le Dia dul ar ais ar a chuid focal. N\u00ed f\u00e9idir s\u00e9 gealltanas agus nach gcomhl\u00edontar! C\u00e9 go bhfuil Dia Dia Cuireann, a chuid focal! Mar sin f\u00e9in, t\u00e1 s\u00e9 an abairt deiridh na saoirse!<\/p>\n N\u00edl an saoirse i d\u00e9anamh an m\u00e9id at\u00e1 chrosadh roimh an cumas a dhi\u00falt\u00fa n\u00f3 gan a bheith toirmiscthe.<\/p>\n Gan an crann agus gan rabhadh Dhiaga n\u00ed bheadh aon feidhmi\u00fa na saoirse, agus t\u00e1 an fear nasctha Le Dia, fi\u00fa i gcoinne a dtola. An riail (saor in aisce) agus an eisceacht (ach) dul le ch\u00e9ile a bheith ind\u00e9anta feidhmi\u00fa na saoirse (Gen. 2:16 -17). D’fh\u00e9adfadh gach crann ghaird\u00edn a shampl\u00e1il faoi shaoirse, ach, ba ch\u00f3ir fear a mheas go m\u00e1 ith s\u00e9 an chrainn an eolas maith agus olc a bheadh, iompr\u00f3idh na hiarmhairt\u00ed (scaradh \u00f3 Dhia).<\/p>\n C\u00e9 a crutha\u00edodh saor in aisce, n\u00ed bheadh aon ch\u00fais saoirse den s\u00f3rt sin m\u00e1s rud \u00e9 nach raibh Adam an deis f\u00edor a fheidhmi\u00fa. Cad \u00e9 an tsaoirse gan an deis a bheith scl\u00e1bhaithe? Roghnaigh nach bhfuil an forbidden i nd\u00e1ir\u00edre saoirse toisc nach bhfuil s\u00e9 c\u00f3na\u00ed i thoirmeasc roimh, ar an bhf\u00e9idearthacht di\u00falt\u00fa rud \u00e9igin is f\u00e9idir: dhaoirse.<\/p>\n D\u00edreach mar a comaoineach le Dia (saol) T\u00e1 riocht freas\u00fala a dh\u00edol ar an glory D\u00e9 (b\u00e1s), a bheith le Dia saoirse, agus choimhthi\u00fa \u00f3 Eisean scl\u00e1bha\u00edocht go pheaca.<\/p>\n Ach amh\u00e1in i gc\u00e1s ina bhfuil an Spiorad D\u00e9, t\u00e1 saoirse, mar sin ach Dia fear saor in aisce agus saol (2 Corantaigh 3:17).<\/p>\n N\u00ed raibh Adam iarracht na tortha\u00ed a bheith saor in aisce, mar gheall ar a triail a bhaint, a ritheadh an riocht gabhadh, faoi bhr\u00e1id a gcinneadh f\u00e9in.<\/p>\n Ag pointe \u00e9igin a bh\u00ed faoi bhr\u00fa Adam chun cinneadh a dh\u00e9anamh?<\/p>\n T\u00e1 saoirse paitinne, soil\u00e9ir, le haghaidh nach raibh Adam br\u00fa isteach a dh\u00e9anamh ar aon chinnt\u00ed. Bh\u00ed s\u00e9 saor in aisce, mar nach raibh aon chine\u00e1l de cos ar bolg a bheadh bhfeidhm air chun cinneadh a dh\u00e9anamh.<\/p>\n N\u00ed raibh a fhios Adam na hiarmhairt\u00ed a gcuid gn\u00edomhartha? N\u00ed raibh s\u00e9 an t-eolas chun cinneadh a dh\u00e9anamh? Bheadh s\u00e9 a bheith ina blessing aineolas?<\/p>\n Is \u00e9 an streachailt ar fhaisn\u00e9is, di\u00falt\u00fa aon r\u00e9imeas polaiti\u00fail a sh\u00e1ra\u00edonn an ceart chun faisn\u00e9is a tairiseach don chine daonna thar na c\u00e9adta bliain. Ach c\u00e9n f\u00e1th c\u00faisigh ionducht\u00fa disobedience D\u00e9 dheon\u00fa ceart chomh daor go Adam nuair ar an eolas maidir leis na hiarmhairt\u00ed a gcuid gn\u00edomhartha?<\/p>\n T\u00e1 fear saor in aisce ach amh\u00e1in nuair a fhios agat na hiarmhairt\u00ed a gcuid gn\u00edomhartha. T\u00e1 fear saor in aisce nuair a bh\u00edonn t\u00fa cead chun cinnt\u00ed a dh\u00e9anamh. T\u00e1 fear saor in aisce nuair a bhfuil t\u00fa an t-eolas a gcuid cinnt\u00ed f\u00e9in a dh\u00e9anamh.<\/p>\n Bh\u00ed an ordan\u00e1s Dhiaga ar aon bhealach treallach, seachas aon ch\u00f3ras dl\u00ed go bhfuil an fear a chum riamh. Is \u00e9 an ordan\u00e1s Dhiaga an abairt is sublime an spiorad an dl\u00ed: mar aidhm \u00e9 a s\u00f3cmhainn\u00ed is t\u00e1bhachta\u00ed de dh\u00e9ant\u00fas an duine a chaomhn\u00fa – an saol agus saoirse.<\/p>\n C\u00e9 nach ithe tortha\u00ed \u00f3n gcrann, bheadh Adam f\u00f3s beo (aontaithe le Dia), toisc go raibh an toradh soil\u00e9ir: surely b\u00e1s (coimhthi\u00fa \u00f3 Dhia). C\u00e9 go mbeadh staonadh \u00f3n gcrann eolais maith agus olc Adam f\u00f3s saor in aisce, ach tar \u00e9is ithe, a dh\u00e9anamh a bheadh ina phr\u00edos\u00fanach do chinneadh f\u00e9in.<\/p>\n Do Mari, carachtar san \u00farsc\u00e9al ‘A chinneadh Veronika a Die’, an scr\u00edbhneoir Paulo Coelho, ba d\u00edbirt \u00f3 Ghaird\u00edn na Eden an l\u00e1n\u00fain treallach agus gan bonn dl\u00edthi\u00fail “… ach le haghaidh briseadh an dl\u00ed treallach, gan aon fhoras dl\u00edthi\u00fail ithe tortha\u00ed ar maith agus olc “<\/span><\/em>Ditto.<\/p>\n N\u00ed f\u00e9idir a shamhl\u00fa go bhfuil duine \u00e9igin, agus a \u00fas\u00e1id mar shampla na harg\u00f3int\u00ed de charachtar Mari, nasctha le c\u00f3ras dl\u00ed at\u00e1 tarraingthe suas ionas nach bhfuil daoine gn\u00e1th tuiscint a fh\u00e1il ar riachtanais, agus t\u00e1 s\u00e9 seo c\u00f3ras chotha\u00edonn an prionsabal nach f\u00e9idir aon duine a \u00e9ileamh aineolas ar an dl\u00ed , ceist go raibh arbitrariness i ordan\u00e1s an Eden.<\/p>\n Bheadh treallach m\u00e1 Dia reachta\u00edocht chun a leasa f\u00e9in, ach bh\u00ed s\u00e9 i gceist leis an ordan\u00e1s a thugtar do Adam amh\u00e1in a chaomhn\u00fa an m\u00e9id a bhain leis an fear. D\u00e9an duine \u00e9igin faoi dhliteanas coiri\u00fail, fi\u00fa amh\u00e1in nuair a bh\u00edonn aineolach ar an dl\u00ed, is \u00e9 a reachta\u00edocht chun tairbhe an dl\u00ed, nach bhfuil an subordinate an dl\u00ed.<\/p>\n N\u00edl aon rud sa corrlach a c\u00faisigh Dia arbitrariness, ach ba mhaith na accusers a chur ar an ordan\u00e1s Dhiaga i fionra\u00ed, fi\u00fa ina gc\u00f3na\u00ed faoi ch\u00f3ras dl\u00ed a navigates na prionsabail n\u00edos \u00edsle ordan\u00e1s diaga. C\u00e9 go bhfuil an ordan\u00e1s Dhiaga aidhm ag an d\u00e1 rud is luachmhaire a tugadh le fear a chaomhn\u00fa, na c\u00f3rais dl\u00ed an lae inniu a molta le coinbhleachta\u00ed leasa a idirghabh\u00e1il, a bheith eminently pion\u00f3sach. Mar shampla: mhar\u00fa duine \u00e9igin a thagann s\u00edos go dt\u00ed pianbhreith pr\u00edos\u00fanachta.<\/p>\n Is \u00e9 an ch\u00faisimh go invented Dia an pion\u00f3s tr\u00edd an ordan\u00e1s a thugtar do Adam bunaithe ar loighic simplistic gan imscr\u00fad\u00fa fi\u00fa na f\u00edric\u00ed a thuairisc\u00edtear sa Bh\u00edobla “Dia (…) Ar a mhalairt, scr\u00edobh an dl\u00ed agus f\u00e1il ar bhealach a chur ina lu\u00ed duine \u00e9igin a bhriseadh, ach a bheith in ann a chumadh Pion\u00f3is “<\/em><\/span>idem.<\/p>\n “Agus i gceannas ar an Tiarna Dia an fear, ag r\u00e1, As gach crann an ghaird\u00edn thou mayest ithe faoi shaoirse, ach an crann an eolas maith agus olc, n\u00ed bheidh t\u00fa ag ithe; sa l\u00e1 a itheann t\u00fa sin, beidh t\u00fa b\u00e1s surely “<\/span>(Geineasas 02:16 -17).<\/p>\n Cad \u00e9 an iarmhairt de dh\u00e9ant\u00fas an gcinneadh a ithe na tortha\u00ed ar an eolas go maith agus olc? B\u00e1s. \u201cN\u00ed raibh an b\u00e1s as a rinne Dia tagairt deireadh na feidhmeanna r\u00edth\u00e1bhachtach de chuid an chomhlachta, mar nuair a thagra\u00edonn do b\u00e1s fisici\u00fail an fear \u00das\u00e1ideann s\u00e9 an t\u00e9arma \u2018filleadh ar deannaigh \u201c.<\/p>\n M\u00e1 bh\u00ed ach Adam and Eve i Eden, bheadh siad b\u00e1s a bhfuil? Ba mhaith leis an gcinneadh a ithe na tortha\u00ed mar thoradh ar coimhthi\u00fa, ina bhac idir Dia agus fir. N\u00edl ach an t\u00e9arma “b\u00e1s” chun cur s\u00edos ar an riocht ’nua’ \u00e1bhartha fear tar \u00e9is titim.<\/p>\n Nuair a thug an rabhadh Dia: ‘N\u00ed bheidh t\u00fa ag ithe’, a bh\u00ed comhartha\u00edochta go m\u00e1s thuilleadh mhian fhear a bhaineann le agus ag brath ar an Cruthaitheoir (saol), a leas a bhaint as \u00ed f\u00e9in ar an eolas ar na tortha\u00ed maith agus olc. Mar a bh\u00ed an fear saor in aisce, m\u00e1s rud \u00e9 nach an chuid is m\u00f3 ag iarraidh a c\u00f3na\u00ed sa sple\u00e1chas c\u00faram agus eolas ar an Tiarna, d’fh\u00e9adfadh ‘a bheith’ ar leith \u00f3 Eisean (b\u00e1s).<\/p>\n Tar \u00e9is ithe na tortha\u00ed ar eolas go maith agus olc, t\u00e1 fear a bheith cos\u00fail le Dia, a fhios agam go maith agus olc. T\u00f3gadh an bhacainn enmity (b\u00e1s, scaradh, coimhthi\u00fa…), agus chuaigh an fear ar a imirt ag an t-eolas a fuarthas.<\/p>\n Dia oppresses aon duine (Job 37:23), agus tempt duine ar bith a bhfuil olc (James 01:13), d\u00e1 bhr\u00ed sin, an titim de dh\u00e9ant\u00fas an duine nach raibh a thagann as an Creator. Ba \u00e9 an fear a sheol an l\u00e1thair an Creator.<\/p>\n Tar \u00e9is ithe na tortha\u00ed agus b\u00e1s (coimhthi\u00fa), th\u00e1inig an fear daor a bheith a chinneadh f\u00e9in. C\u00e9 a bheith cos\u00fail le Dia, a fhios agam go maith agus olc a bh\u00ed choimhthi\u00fa Dia, d\u00e1 bhr\u00ed sin, iarradh,, de bheith i seilbh a gcuid f\u00e9in. Nuair roinnte an glory D\u00e9, n\u00ed raibh an fear mar a Dhia, agus a fhios go maith agus olc, ach th\u00e1inig Dia as gach rud. As gach crann an ghaird\u00edn a bh\u00ed curtha go bhfuil ag an Tiarna d’fh\u00e9adfadh an fear a ithe faoi shaoirse, leis an titim, bh\u00ed fear i seilbh an t-eolas is g\u00e1 agus is g\u00e1 a choinne\u00e1il ar an sweat ar a brow (Gen. 3:19).<\/p>\n An coinn\u00edoll \u00c1dhaimh ionann an Mac a bhainist\u00edonn a athar fuascailt: seasamh Leo f\u00e9in. Nuair a bh\u00ed aithne air go leor till agus claonadh an gaird\u00edn D\u00e9, anois, amach as an ghaird\u00edn, cuireadh an talamh dealga agus bhfeochadan a th\u00e1irgeadh, agus mar sin provesse fear d\u00e1 sl\u00ed bheatha tr\u00edd an sweat a brow (Gen. 3:18). N\u00ed raibh an obair pion\u00f3s, mar d’oibrigh an fear \u00f3 buna\u00edodh \u00e9 a chur sa ghaird\u00edn.<\/p>\n Th\u00e1inig an fear ’neamhsple\u00e1ch’ tar \u00e9is an titim, agus bh\u00ed a caitheadh amach as an Garden of Eden chun t\u00fas a toil treabhadh talamh “deacair” a th\u00e1irgeann Allais i gcomhr\u00e9ir leis an mbeart de dh\u00e9ant\u00fas an obair (Gen. 3:23). Tabhair faoi deara go bhfuil difr\u00edocht mh\u00f3r idir ’saoirse’ (saol) agus ’neamhsple\u00e1chas’ (b\u00e1s). Nuair a bheidh s\u00e9 saor in aisce, t\u00e1 gaol bunaithe idir na p\u00e1irtithe, ach neamhsple\u00e1chas \u00e1 mbun\u00fa, t\u00e1 caidreamh gearrtha amach.<\/p>\n Sula raibh an fear titim saor in aisce chun a chinneadh cib\u00e9 acu at\u00e1 n\u00f3 d’fhan scartha f\u00e9in as an Creator. Tar \u00e9is an titim, th\u00e1inig chun bheith ina daor ar a chinneadh f\u00e9in toisc nach bhfuil na modhanna chun filleadh ar an Creator. C\u00e9 a lorg go leor ar ais go dt\u00ed an Cruthaitheoir ar a gcuid f\u00e9in, t\u00e1 doomed le teip.<\/p>\n Ar ais go beo is f\u00e9idir ach amh\u00e1in tr\u00edd an Cruthaitheoir f\u00e9in, ag cur in i\u00fal gr\u00e1mhar tr\u00edna chuid focal. Toisc nach raibh an fear a thabhairt creidmheasa (chreid) an focal go raibh s\u00e9 ar feadh a saoil, an bealach amh\u00e1in go bhfuil an fear ar ais go dt\u00ed an saol chun a chreidi\u00faint i an focal an incarnate Word – Cr\u00edost, a bh\u00ed bainteach i Eden le ‘teofanicamente’ le Adam.<\/p>\n Sin \u00e9 an f\u00e1th a deir Cr\u00edost: “An t\u00e9 a chreideann i Mise, mar t\u00e1 an Scripture sin, sruthanna maireacht\u00e1la sreabhadh uisce \u00f3 laistigh d\u00f3” (Eoin 07:38). Just a gcreideann an Scriopt\u00fair! N\u00ed g\u00e1 duit mar a rinne O\u00edche, go in ionad a chreidi\u00faint i an focal an \u00edomh\u00e1 a chur in i\u00fal D\u00e9, d’iarr a focal a neart\u00fa “Agus d\u00fairt an bhean go dt\u00ed an nathair, As na tortha\u00ed ghaird\u00edn crainn ithe, ach an chrainn at\u00e1 i l\u00e1r an ghaird\u00edn, d\u00fairt Dia, n\u00ed bheidh Ye itheann s\u00e9, n\u00ed beidh sibh l\u00e1mh a chur air, lest ye b\u00e1s “<\/span>(Gen. 3: 2 -3).<\/p>\n Bh\u00ed s\u00e9 go leor chun a chreidi\u00faint an focal an Tiarna a d\u00fairt s\u00e9 leo go ‘b\u00e1s surely’ bheadh m\u00e1 \u00fas\u00e1ideann an tsaoirse a bh\u00ed acu, agus itheann an crann an eolas maith agus olc. Tharl\u00f3dh de bharr an nathair, tr\u00edna ch\u00e9ile Eve an ordan\u00e1s, a chuir b\u00e9im ar an tsaoirse, ar an airdeall agus go c\u00faramach, rud a chialla\u00edonn s\u00e9 ’dl\u00ed’ go docht prohibitive: “N\u00ed bheidh feidhm ag Ye itheann s\u00e9, n\u00ed beidh sibh l\u00e1mh a chur air, lest ye b\u00e1s”<\/span> (Gen. 3: 3).<\/p>\n Gc\u00e1s nach bhfuil ach ’dl\u00ed’ amh\u00e1in prohibitive in ionad an ordan\u00e1s a chuireann saoirse, oibr\u00edonn an lust i fear, mar a thuiscint an saoirse an ordan\u00e1s mar go docht commandment (Dl\u00ed), oibr\u00edonn pheaca gach lust. Mar shampla: Eva fh\u00e9ach agus chonaic go raibh an crann go maith le haghaidh bia, taitneamhach don ts\u00fail agus inmhianaithe a dh\u00e9anamh ar cheann ciallmhar (Mar a mheas s\u00ed an ordan\u00e1s a bheith docht commandment, pheaca tr\u00edd an aithne oibrigh gach lust), resorted s\u00ed na tortha\u00ed agus ith.<\/p>\n Fi\u00fa m\u00e1s rud \u00e9 nach bhfuil an cosc (dl\u00ed) pheaca, t\u00e1 a fhios fear amh\u00e1in lust nuair a bh\u00edonn Le an toirmeasc (dl\u00ed). Saoirse ’de gach crann mayest thou shaoirse a ithe’ Bh\u00ed peaca marbh, mar ina gc\u00f3na\u00ed gan dl\u00ed mar an gc\u00e9anna, toisc go bhfuil an dl\u00ed (toirmeasc) r\u00e9as\u00fana\u00edocht ach amh\u00e1in chun na transgressors (1 Tim 1: 9), agus an ordan\u00e1s faoi ch\u00faram saor in aisce. Amh\u00e1in toirmeasc ‘N\u00ed bheidh a ithe ar s\u00e9, pheaca cheapann \u00f3c\u00e1id, toisc go gcr\u00edochna\u00edonn s\u00e9 suas ag obair ar gach lust.<\/p>\n C\u00e9 go raibh saoirse fear ina gc\u00f3na\u00ed, ach t\u00e1 an toirmeasc ’nach Eat de’, faoi sti\u00fair an lust don pheaca thug b\u00e1s. Tabhair faoi deara go bhfuil an aithne a bh\u00ed ar feadh an tsaoil, bh\u00ed b\u00e1s. T\u00e1 an cheannasa\u00edocht (ordan\u00e1s) naofa, c\u00f3ir agus go maith, agus an dl\u00ed (toirmeasc) Santa, \u00e1fach, pheaca \u00f3c\u00e1id le f\u00e1il sa ordan\u00e1s at\u00e1 mara\u00edodh an fear. Sin le f\u00e1il ach amh\u00e1in \u00f3c\u00e1id mar gheall ar, a tharl\u00f3dh de bharr an cheist ar an nathair, thuig O\u00edche gur teoranta an ordan\u00e1s docht dl\u00ed prohibitive, agus tr\u00edd an aithne ’nach budh ithe’, deceived pheaca di agus mharaigh s\u00ed.<\/p>\n D\u00e1 bhr\u00ed sin, n\u00ed m\u00f3r aon l\u00e9amh na scriopt\u00fair a thuiscint go \u00e1it a bhfuil an Spiorad an Tiarna go bhfuil saoirse, ach an dl\u00ed ina n-aonar worketh wrath: Beidh do pheaca teacht i gc\u00f3na\u00ed \u00f3c\u00e1id sa dl\u00ed tr\u00ed lust.<\/p>\n Is \u00e9 an dl\u00ed a fhorchuirtear ach ar chiont\u00f3ir\u00ed (1 Tim 1: 9), agus mar gheall ar an transgressors (Gal 3:19). An d\u00e1 bh\u00ed an dl\u00ed, “a itheann an chrainn a ordaigh m\u00e9 t\u00fa a ithe”<\/span> (Geineasas 3:11), mar an dl\u00ed de Moses chur leis mar gheall ar an transgression, mar go n-oibr\u00edonn s\u00e9 ar an wrath Dia, in ionad c\u00faraim ordan\u00e1s, at\u00e1 \u00fadar maith leis an righteous (1 Tim 1: 9).<\/p>\n A bhuaigh an ’nathair’, bh\u00ed Eva leor chun clo\u00ed leis an ordan\u00e1s Dhiaga mar a rinne Cr\u00edost nuair a d\u00fairt s\u00e9, “T\u00e1 s\u00e9 nach bhfuil scr\u00edofa ag ar\u00e1n a dh\u00e9anann fear beo, ach ag gach focal a f\u00e1ltais \u00f3 bh\u00e9al no Dia amh\u00e1in”<\/span> (Mt 4 : 4). N\u00edl difr\u00edocht idir:<\/p>\n Rinne s\u00ed dearmad go bhf\u00e9adfadh na crainn ithe faoi shaoirse, a thug le concl\u00faid cearr: “N\u00ed bheidh feidhm ag t\u00fa a ithe de, n\u00ed beidh sibh l\u00e1mh a chur air …”.<\/p>\n C\u00e9 go saothra\u00edonn an c\u00f3ras dl\u00ed an lae inniu ar an gciont\u00f3ir a fhorchur ar an pion\u00f3s forordaithe, an ordan\u00e1s an Eden chur ach fear an eolas faoi na hiarmhairt\u00ed a gcuid gn\u00edomhartha. N\u00ed raibh Dia a shaothr\u00fa an fear chun pion\u00f3s a ghearradh air sular fhulaing an fear na hiarmhairt\u00ed a chinneadh sin ith na tortha\u00ed.<\/p>\n C\u00e9 go ndearna an nathair an t-eolas maith agus olc is tarraingteach do dhaoine ag ithe na tortha\u00ed, ach Dia rabhadh go m\u00e1 ith s\u00ed na tortha\u00ed, a bheadh an fear ina bhac idir fear agus Dia (b\u00e1s, pheaca, coimhthi\u00fa, scl\u00e1bha\u00edocht) a bhun\u00fa.<\/p>\n M\u00e1 chuir Dia ina bhac idir fear agus an crann an eolas maith agus olc, a bhun\u00fa caidreamh distrust idir Creator agus creature. N\u00edl c\u00faisigh skeptics l\u00e1 at\u00e1 inniu Dia a dh\u00e9anamh ‘v\u00f3ta’ muin\u00edne i fear. M\u00e1 bh\u00ed bhac idir fear agus an crann ar eolas maith agus olc a bheadh, a mha\u00edomh go raibh ag pointe \u00e9igin an fear saor in aisce.<\/p>\n Cad a dh\u00e9anaimid a fheice\u00e1il? Cad \u00e9 an cusp\u00f3ir na ceisteanna at\u00e1 \u00e1 ardaithe inniu? Faisn\u00e9is a iarraidh n\u00e1 a iarraidh a flatten Dia?<\/p>\n T\u00e1 asl\u00fa le coireacht, disobedience, \u00e9ir\u00ed amach an ordan\u00e1s seo a leanas?<\/p>\n “An Dia Tiarna commanded an fear, ag r\u00e1, As gach crann an ghaird\u00edn thou mayest ithe faoi shaoirse, ach an crann an eolas maith agus olc, n\u00ed bheidh t\u00fa ag ithe, sa l\u00e1 a itheann t\u00fa sin, beidh t\u00fa b\u00e1s surely”<\/span> (Geineasas 02:16 -17).<\/p>\n M\u00e1 t\u00e1 an athchomhaireamh B\u00edobla a d’fh\u00e1g Dia an crann gan rabhadh sa ghaird\u00edn, agus curtha i measc na crainn eile d\u00e1 samhail, agus ngan fhios fear ith na tortha\u00ed agus a fuair b\u00e1s, c\u00faisigh Dia a bheith adh, \u00e9ag\u00f3rach agus gan gr\u00e1 as a chuid cr\u00e9at\u00fair.<\/p>\n Mari, tar \u00e9is cheisti\u00fa an spreagadh D\u00e9 a chur ar an crann ar eolas maith agus olc i l\u00e1r an ghaird\u00edn satirizes, an sc\u00e9al de na himeachta\u00ed tar \u00e9is titim de dh\u00e9ant\u00fas an duine agus le fios go raibh Dia \u00e1 sadistic:<\/p>\n “Nuair a bh\u00ed briste an dl\u00ed, a Dhia – an Breitheamh Almighty – fi\u00fa insamhladh ar shaothr\u00fa, amhail is d\u00e1 mba a fhios acu go l\u00e9ir na h\u00e1iteanna hiding is f\u00e9idir. Leis na haingil ag faire agus amusing f\u00e9in leis an prank (saol m\u00f3r iad a bheith an-tr\u00edna ch\u00e9ile, \u00f3s rud \u00e9 gur fh\u00e1g Lucifer Heaven), thosaigh s\u00e9 ag si\u00fal. Mari sh\u00edl mar sin sliocht B\u00edobla a dh\u00e9anfadh radharc \u00e1lainn i sc\u00e9ins\u00e9ir: na c\u00e9imeanna D\u00e9 Breathna\u00edonn, scanraithe go mhalart\u00fa an l\u00e1n\u00fain eatarthu f\u00e9in, na cosa stop tobann in aice leis an taisce “<\/em><\/span>Ditto.<\/p>\n Cad \u00e9 Mari dl\u00edod\u00f3ir an \u00farsc\u00e9al, an bhfuil go leor ar bhonn l\u00e1 go l\u00e1. Bain \u00fas\u00e1id as a n-eolas gairmi\u00fail, n\u00f3 a n-oili\u00faint acad\u00fail a flatten cad nach bhfuil siad a thuiscint.<\/p>\n Bheadh radharc i sc\u00e9ins\u00e9ir T\u00e1 na c\u00e9imeanna D\u00e9 i Eden? Dia T\u00e1 cosa? Dia insamhladh ar shaothr\u00fa? Bh\u00ed Dia sadistic?<\/p>\n Eolas dl\u00edthi\u00fail, stairi\u00fail agus fi\u00fa eola\u00edochta nach leor \u00ed chun meas\u00fan\u00fa a dh\u00e9anamh ar na ceisteanna thuas. Ach m\u00e1 t\u00e1 t\u00fa eolas B\u00edobla, n\u00edl aon bhac in aon sliocht B\u00edobla.<\/p>\n Go ginear\u00e1lta f\u00e9achana unwary an str\u00e1ice an Dia B\u00edobla ina ghl\u00f3ir agus SOILSE, \u00e1fach, d\u00e9an dearmad go bhfuil an B\u00edobla t\u00e1 imeachta\u00ed theophany iomad\u00fala. Is Theophany coincheap diagachta de chine\u00e1l a chialla\u00edonn an l\u00e9iri\u00fa ar Dhia in aon \u00e1it, rud n\u00f3 duine. Na himeachta\u00ed chomhaireamh Tagra\u00edonn is suntasa\u00ed do mhuintir Abraham (Geineasas 18: 1 -2) agus Moses (Ex 3: 2 -6).<\/p>\n Ach tharla an theophany is t\u00e1bhachta\u00ed i Eden toisc go raibh Adam crutha\u00edodh \u00f3 deannaigh as an talamh agus bh\u00ed a bhaineann go d\u00edreach leis an \u00edomh\u00e1 a chur in i\u00fal D\u00e9 – Chr\u00edost. C\u00e9 h\u00e9 an \u00edomh\u00e1 a chur in i\u00fal D\u00e9? An scr\u00edbhneoir don Eabhraigh deir Cr\u00edost, Mac D\u00e9 (Heb 1: 2 -3). Is \u00e9 \u00cdosa an \u00edomh\u00e1 a chur in i\u00fal D\u00e9, oidhre ar gach rud, agus tr\u00edd go raibh an domhan a rinneadh, lena n-\u00e1ir\u00edtear a chruth\u00fa Adam (Seanfhocal 30: 4).<\/p>\n Nuair a d\u00fairt Dia, “Lig d\u00fainn a dh\u00e9anamh fear in \u00e1r \u00edomh\u00e1, i ndiaidh \u00e1r likeness”<\/span> (Gen. 1:26), ba \u00e9 an \u00edomh\u00e1 a chur in i\u00fal D\u00e9 i gceannas ar an tasc. Mar a chruthaigh Dia fear ina \u00edomh\u00e1 f\u00e9in? An \u00edomh\u00e1 sainr\u00e1ite an Dia dofheicthe, an Word eternal a bh\u00ed a embody, freagrach freisin as gach chruth\u00fa, chruthaigh fear mar a figi\u00far (Gen. 1:27; Rom 05:14).<\/p>\n Ag meabhr\u00fa d\u00f3ibh go bhfuil an figi\u00far an \u00edomh\u00e1 an-de na ruda\u00ed, n\u00ed m\u00f3r d\u00fainn ach glorified Cr\u00edost an \u00edomh\u00e1 agus likeness D\u00e9, agus fir amh\u00e1in a reappear leis a bheith ag an cusp\u00f3ir s\u00edora\u00ed a buna\u00edodh i Eden is \u00e9 sin le fear mar an \u00edomh\u00e1 de Cr\u00edost, de r\u00e9ir an fh\u00eds de Cr\u00edost, a bhfuil an \u00edomh\u00e1 a chur in i\u00fal D\u00e9 (Gen 01:27).<\/p>\n Dia a chruthaigh fear i \u00edomh\u00e1 Chr\u00edost mar an ceann at\u00e1 cos\u00fail d\u00f3, is \u00e9 sin, de r\u00e9ir mar a Mhac. Agus mar an fear a rinneadh i \u00edomh\u00e1 an Mac D\u00e9? Mac D\u00e9 (\u00edomh\u00e1 D\u00e9) chruthaigh s\u00e9. Is \u00e9 sin, agus mar sin chruthaigh Dia fear an \u00edomh\u00e1 a Mhac, a crutha\u00edodh an Mac (Gen. 1:27).<\/p>\n Sin \u00e9 an f\u00e1th d\u00e9anta Dia (l\u00e1mha) an fear deannaigh as an talamh agus breathed isteach ina (an\u00e1il) isteach nostrils (b\u00e9al) (Gen. 2: 7). Thairis sin, chuir gaird\u00edn i Eden, agus ansin chuir s\u00e9 an fear, nach bhfuil an \u00edomh\u00e1 an-(in i\u00fal) roimh figi\u00far de Chr\u00edost, a bhfuil an i\u00fal (cruinn) \u00edomh\u00e1 de Dhia.<\/p>\n An Tiarna \u00cdosa \u00fas\u00e1id as a l\u00e1mha a dh\u00e9anamh c\u00fant\u00f3ir do Adam (Geineasas 2:21), labhair leis an l\u00e1n\u00fain (Gen. 3: 8), agus \u00e9ada\u00ed a rinneadh don d\u00e1 (Gen. 3:21). N\u00f3 n\u00ed raibh Adam cheilt toisc chuala s\u00e9 footsteps roimh toisc go chuala s\u00e9 an guth an \u00edomh\u00e1 a chur in i\u00fal de Dhia. Hid siad toisc nach raibh m\u00e9 ag iarraidh Dia (theophany = \u00edomh\u00e1 sainr\u00e1ite D\u00e9) a chonaic iad gan costumes.<\/p>\n Mar a bh\u00ed Cr\u00edost do Abraham, bh\u00ed an chuma chomh maith agus a bhaineann le Adam, a bh\u00ed ar a figi\u00far “Do athair Abraham g\u00e1irdeachus a fheice\u00e1il mo l\u00e1: agus chonaic s\u00e9 \u00e9 agus bh\u00ed s\u00e9 s\u00e1sta”<\/span> (Eoin 08:56; rom 05:14).<\/p>\n D\u00f3ibh si\u00fad nach dtuigeann na himeachta\u00ed, is cos\u00fail comical an Dia uile-chumhachtach lorg l\u00e1n\u00fain sa ghaird\u00edn na Eden, ach bh\u00ed a bhaineann Adam leis an \u00edomh\u00e1 a chur in i\u00fal D\u00e9, do fuair s\u00e9 uaidh an ordan\u00e1s. Uaireanta an Tiarna thug cuairt ar an l\u00e1n\u00fain sa ghaird\u00edn, rinne amhlaidh i theophany, n\u00ed unfading ghl\u00f3ir.<\/p>\n N\u00ed raibh an Cuairt an Tiarna le guth de thunder, mar a breathna\u00edodh i l\u00e1ithrithe eile, sular labhair Adam le duine \u00e9igin a bh\u00ed a chuid cothrom, cos\u00fail d\u00f3. Tar \u00e9is an titim, labhair Dia ar\u00eds le Adam mar a bh\u00ed s\u00e9 i gc\u00f3na\u00ed, agus n\u00ed le tine, tintreach, toirneach agus dorchadas tiubh a terrify d\u00f3.<\/p>\n Anois, nuair a d’iarr Dia iad a chr\u00edochn\u00fa an l\u00e1, chinn an l\u00e1n\u00fain a cheilt. I bhfad \u00f3 Dhia insamhladh ar t\u00f3ir, roimh an l\u00e1n\u00fain a leagtar amach a cheilt. Ar deireadh, chun iad a \u201ciarraidh ar\u00eds: \u201c? C\u00e1 \u201cbhfuil t\u00fa\u201d a d\u00fairt Adam a baoiseanna agus an n\u00e1ire a bhaineann le bheith naked.<\/p>\n T\u00e1 an fear a bheith cos\u00fail le Dia, a fhios agam go maith agus olc (Gen. 3:22). Adam and Eve th\u00e1inig an ’nathair’ d\u00fairt s\u00e9 Leo (Gen. 3: 5), \u00e1fach, \u00fas\u00e1id as coimhthi\u00fa \u00f3 Dhia.<\/p>\n N\u00ed raibh s\u00e9 Dia a fhorchuirtear le fir na m\u00edlte rialacha agus dl\u00edthe at\u00e1 acu. Is \u00e9 an g\u00e1 at\u00e1 Le rialacha agus dl\u00edthe rud n\u00e1d\u00far an-an duine.<\/p>\n Fi\u00fa amh\u00e1in roimh sin, nuair a d’iarr an nathair, n\u00edos measa O\u00edche an ordan\u00e1s Dhiaga: “N\u00ed bheidh feidhm ag Ye itheann s\u00e9, n\u00ed beidh sibh l\u00e1mh a chur air, lest ye b\u00e1s”<\/span> (Gen. 3: 3). Fir duit f\u00e9in dl\u00edthe, mar go chrutha\u00edonn siad dl\u00edthe, rialacha agus revel i saincheisteanna mor\u00e1lta. Pune ar bith nach bhfuil oiri\u00fanach isteach ina rialacha.<\/p>\n Dia a chruthaigh an fear naked agus thug siad aon dl\u00ed i gcoinne nudity, ach bhraith an fear n\u00e1ire \u00e9 f\u00e9in, agus chinn ar uaithi f\u00e9in chun iad f\u00e9in a chl\u00fadach (Gen. 3: 7).<\/p>\n C\u00e9n f\u00e1th flatten Dia, m\u00e1s rud \u00e9 go raibh gach rud a chruthaigh s\u00e9 go maith? “Ach, O fear, a eala\u00edn tusa sin do Dhia? Beidh an rud d\u00e9anta a r\u00e1 d\u00f3 go ch\u00e9ile \u00e9, C\u00e9n f\u00e1th chumhra & fdot; orm a rinne sin? “<\/span>(R\u00f3mh\u00e1naigh 09:20 -21) ?.<\/p>\n Na igniters fheice\u00e1il ach amh\u00e1in ar an ordan\u00e1s Dhiaga bealach invented ag Dia chun pion\u00f3s a ghearradh ar an fear, \u00e1fach, c\u00e9n dl\u00ed m\u00fanla c\u00f3ras is fanacht fear chun pion\u00f3s a ghearradh: c\u00f3rais dl\u00ed at\u00e1 ann faoi l\u00e1thair, n\u00f3 an ordan\u00e1s an Eden? Rud coisctheacha sa ch\u00f3ras dl\u00ed sa l\u00e1 at\u00e1 inniu?<\/p>\n Ar deireadh, go gcuirf\u00ed b\u00e9im ar an ng\u00e1 at\u00e1 le ceisteanna a chur, \u00e1fach, \u00e1if\u00e9iseach d’fh\u00e9adfadh siad cos\u00fail ar dt\u00fas m\u00e1 t\u00e1 suim agat in eolas againn, \u00e1fach, nuair a bombarded le ceist, athbhreithni\u00fa a dh\u00e9anamh ar an intinn an ceistitheoir.<\/p>\n Tar \u00e9is a shoil\u00e9iri\u00fa an intinn an ceistitheoir, mura bhfuil t\u00fa cinnte, breathn\u00fa ar an freagra sa Bh\u00edobla, mar a bh\u00ed an James Apostle soil\u00e9ir nuair a d\u00fairt s\u00e9: “Anois, m\u00e1 easpa aon cheann de t\u00fa eagna, a iarraidh ar Dhia, a thugann le gach liberally agus gan oirbhire agus tabharfar “<\/span>(James 1: 5).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Dia a chur ar an crann an eolas maith agus olc i measc an ghaird\u00edn, gan aon bhac a chosc fear a ithe ar chuid tortha\u00ed a thabhairt duit saoirse.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":88,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[32],"class_list":["post-39","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sem-categoria","tag-maith-agus-olc"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/ga\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/ga\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/ga\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/ga\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/ga\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/ga\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/ga\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/88"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/ga\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/ga\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/ga\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
\n
\n
\n