{"id":13,"date":"2017-10-22T18:12:14","date_gmt":"2017-10-22T20:12:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/is.estudosbiblicos.org\/?p=13"},"modified":"2017-10-22T18:12:14","modified_gmt":"2017-10-22T20:12:14","slug":"hvers-vegna-gud-er-godur","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/is\/2017\/10\/22\/hvers-vegna-gud-er-godur\/","title":{"rendered":"Hvers vegna Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ef ma\u00f0ur er \u00f3tr\u00famennsku, enn Gu\u00f0 tr\u00far. Ef ma\u00f0ur er ekki a\u00f0 treysta \u00e1, ver\u00f0ur ekki fyrirgefi\u00f0, en Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur. Gu\u00f0 getur ekki afneita\u00f0 sj\u00e1lfum s\u00e9r, hann er \u00f3breytanlegur. Hvernig getur \u00feetta veri\u00f0? Gu\u00f0 er „gott“ jafnvel \u00feegar hann refsar \u00feeim illr\u00e6\u00f0ismenn? Jamm! Bibl\u00edan er afdr\u00e1ttarlaus: „S\u00e9rhver g\u00f3\u00f0 gj\u00f6f og s\u00e9rhver fullkomin g\u00e1fa er ofan a\u00f0 og kemur ni\u00f0ur fr\u00e1 f\u00f6\u00f0ur lj\u00f3sanna, me\u00f0 hverjum \u00fea\u00f0 er engin breyting e\u00f0a skuggi af beygja“<\/span> (James 1:17); „\u00dev\u00ed a\u00f0 \u00e9g er Drottinn, a\u00f0 \u00e9g breyti ekki, \u00fev\u00ed \u00fe\u00e9r synir Jakobs eru ekki neytt“<\/span> (Malak\u00ed 3: 6).<\/p>\n

\n

Hvers vegna Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur?<\/span><\/h2>\n

„Lofi\u00f0 Drottinn, \u00fev\u00ed a\u00f0 hann er g\u00f3\u00f0ur, \u00fev\u00ed a\u00f0 miskunn hans varir a\u00f0 eil\u00edfu“<\/span> (Sl 136: 1)<\/p>\n

Inngangur<\/u><\/strong><\/h2>\n

Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur! \u00deetta er sta\u00f0a Ritningarinnar.<\/p>\n

\u00cd vi\u00f0b\u00f3t vi\u00f0 umsagnarinnar „g\u00f3\u00f0a“ Gu\u00f0 er l\u00fdst eins og einn sem heldur \u00e1 fyrirgefningu og fullur af g\u00f3\u00f0vild til allra sem \u00e1kalla hann „\u00fev\u00ed a\u00f0 \u00fe\u00fa, Drottinn, ert g\u00f3\u00f0ur og f\u00fas til a\u00f0 fyrirgefa, og gn\u00e6g\u00f0 \u00ed miskunn allt \u00fea\u00f0 kalla yfir \u00feig „<\/span>(Sl 86: 5).<\/p>\n

Hva\u00f0 um \u00fe\u00e1 sem kalla ekki \u00e1 Gu\u00f0? Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur? J\u00e1, Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur! Bibl\u00edan s\u00fdnir a\u00f0 ef ma\u00f0ur er \u00f3tr\u00famennsku, enn hann tr\u00far, \u00fev\u00ed Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur, jafnvel \u00feegar ma\u00f0ur er ekki hr\u00f3pa „Ef v\u00e9r s\u00e9um \u00f3tr\u00fair, er hann tr\u00far: hann getur ekki afneita\u00f0 sj\u00e1lfum s\u00e9r“<\/span> (2 T\u00edm 2:13 ).<\/p>\n

Ef ma\u00f0ur er \u00f3tr\u00famennsku, enn Gu\u00f0 tr\u00far. Ef ma\u00f0ur er ekki a\u00f0 treysta \u00e1, ver\u00f0ur ekki fyrirgefi\u00f0, en Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur. Gu\u00f0 getur ekki afneita\u00f0 sj\u00e1lfum s\u00e9r, hann er \u00f3breytanlegur. Hvernig getur \u00feetta veri\u00f0? Gu\u00f0 er „gott“ jafnvel \u00feegar hann refsar \u00feeim illr\u00e6\u00f0ismenn? Jamm! Bibl\u00edan er afdr\u00e1ttarlaus: „S\u00e9rhver g\u00f3\u00f0 gj\u00f6f og s\u00e9rhver fullkomin g\u00e1fa er ofan a\u00f0 og kemur ni\u00f0ur fr\u00e1 f\u00f6\u00f0ur lj\u00f3sanna, me\u00f0 hverjum \u00fea\u00f0 er engin breyting e\u00f0a skuggi af beygja“<\/span> (James 1:17); „\u00dev\u00ed a\u00f0 \u00e9g er Drottinn, a\u00f0 \u00e9g breyti ekki, \u00fev\u00ed \u00fe\u00e9r synir Jakobs eru ekki neytt“<\/span> (Malak\u00ed 3: 6).<\/p>\n

Gu\u00f0 mun \u00e1fram „gott“ jafnvel \u00feegar hella rei\u00f0i s\u00edna \u00e1 impenitent? Hvernig m\u00e1 \u00fea\u00f0 vera svo miki\u00f0 \u00fej\u00e1ningu \u00ed mannkyninu og Gu\u00f0 eru g\u00f3\u00f0ar? \u00de\u00fa getur s\u00e6tt Gu\u00f0 ‘alm\u00e1ttugur’ og ‘gott’ vi\u00f0 vandann fram af hugmyndafr\u00e6\u00f0i tilvist hins illa?<\/p>\n

Sumir telja \u00feessi m\u00e1l sem gu\u00f0fr\u00e6\u00f0ileg vandam\u00e1l miklu st\u00e6r\u00f0argr\u00e1\u00f0u, \u00fe\u00f3, en vandinn er ekki \u00e1 Gu\u00f0, en \u00ed \u00feeim skilningi margra sem reyndi a\u00f0 sameina heimspeki vi\u00f0 gu\u00f0fr\u00e6\u00f0i.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur<\/u><\/strong><\/h2>\n

Gu\u00f0 er Gu\u00f0, sem er, alm\u00e1ttugur, alvitur og omnipresent. Vi\u00f0 erum l\u00edka sagt \u00ed Bibl\u00edunni a\u00f0 Gu\u00f0 er Drottinn og Gu\u00f0 og fa\u00f0ir, konungur, o.fl.<\/p>\n

En hva\u00f0 \u00e1tt er vi\u00f0 me\u00f0 „gott“ \u00feegar vi\u00f0 lesum: „Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur“?<\/p>\n

Fyrsta lesandi vi\u00f0br\u00f6g\u00f0 \u00e1huga \u00e1 a\u00f0 vita hi\u00f0 sanna merkingu hugtaksins er a\u00f0 leita or\u00f0ab\u00f3k og gera eftirfarandi lestur: „Gott – adj. – 1. \u00dea\u00f0 er eins og \u00fea\u00f0 \u00e6tti a\u00f0 vera e\u00f0a hvernig \u00e9g \u00e6tti a\u00f0 vera; 2. Hva\u00f0 er g\u00e6ska; 3. Kunn\u00e1tta, r\u00e9tthent; 4. Worker; 5. Hagst\u00e6\u00f0; 6. Ar\u00f0b\u00e6r, 7. fyndinn, fyndinn; 8. Samh\u00e6ft skyldur \u00feeirra; 9. Safe, solid; 10. Regluleg, Normal; 11. Hentar. – S. m. – 12. Good Man „<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Hver \u00feessara predicates um Gu\u00f0 \u00feegar vi\u00f0 lesum „Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur“? L\u00fdsingaror\u00f0 sem talin eru upp h\u00e9r a\u00f0 ofan eru allar vi\u00f0eigandi a\u00f0 heimsmynd mannsins okkar t\u00edma, myndin af n\u00fat\u00edma ma\u00f0ur. Fyrir n\u00fat\u00edma „gott“ ma\u00f0ur \u00e1tt a\u00f0 pers\u00f3nulegum krafti, varanleg r\u00e1\u00f0st\u00f6fun \u00e1 manni ekki a\u00f0 gera illt, benevolent.<\/p>\n

En \u00feetta var heimss\u00fdn s\u00e1lmask\u00e1ldinu David \u00feegar hann sag\u00f0i: „Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur“?<\/p>\n

\u00de\u00f3tt valdat\u00edma Dav\u00ed\u00f0s flokkast sem theocratic, \u00ed t\u00edma samf\u00e9l\u00f6gum hans voru skipul\u00f6g\u00f0 og r\u00e6kta\u00f0 menningu me\u00f0 aristocratic meginreglu, \u00fev\u00ed \u00fea\u00f0 var miki\u00f0 fjarl\u00e6g\u00f0 milli konungs og einstaklingum hans. \u00cd f\u00e9lagslegum samskiptum, \u00fea\u00f0 var miki\u00f0 bil \u00e1 milli skipstj\u00f3ra og \u00fej\u00f3nn, mj\u00f6g fyrirb\u00e6ri aristocratic samf\u00e9l\u00f6gum.<\/p>\n

\u00c1 heildina liti\u00f0, fyrirf\u00f3lks (gr\u00edska \u03b1\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03ba\u03c1\u03b1\u03c4\u03af\u03b1 af \u03ac\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2 (Aristos), best, og \u03ba\u03c1\u03ac\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2 (Kratos), m\u00e1ttur, r\u00edki), lesa ‘vald af the bestur „, \u00fea\u00f0 er, \u00fea\u00f0 er stj\u00f3rnarform \u00fear sem elitist h\u00f3p st\u00fdrir p\u00f3lit\u00edsk v\u00f6ld, og borgin-r\u00edki \u00ed Spartverjar st\u00f6\u00f0u td stj\u00f3rna\u00f0 me\u00f0 fyrirf\u00f3lks.<\/p>\n

Sl\u00edk tilnefning „m\u00e1ttur af the bestur“ minnir okkur \u00e1 a\u00f0, \u00ed forn\u00f6ld, a\u00f0alsm\u00f6nnum var tilnefnd ‘best’, ‘g\u00f3\u00f0ur’, ‘\u00fe\u00fa’, ‘\u00f6\u00f0ruv\u00edsi’, ‘vali\u00f0’.<\/p>\n

Gott? Jamm! Gr\u00edska hugtaki\u00f0 \u00fe\u00fd\u00f0a „gott“ er \u1f00\u03b3\u03b1\u03b8\u03bf\u03cd\u03c2 (agathos), upprunnin \u00ed \u00f6\u00f0ru samsvarar nafnor\u00f0inu r\u00f3t Arete „… sem er \u00ed sj\u00e1lfu s\u00e9r bl\u00f6ndu af g\u00f6fgi og herna\u00f0arlega hreysti (…) n\u00e6stum aldrei hafa s\u00ed\u00f0ar tilfinningu“ gott „, eins og arete hefur ekki si\u00f0vit“<\/em><\/span> Jaeger, Werner, PAIDEIA, myndun ma\u00f0ur Greek \u00fe\u00fd\u00f0ingar Arthur M. Parreira, London: .. Ed Martins Fontes, 2003. Page 27;<\/p>\n

„H\u00fasr\u00e1\u00f0andi og arete voru \u00f3a\u00f0skiljanlega sameina\u00f0ir. The r\u00f3t or\u00f0sins er s\u00fa sama: \u03ac\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2, Greinar fr\u00e6gur og vali\u00f0 … „<\/span><\/em>Ibid, 26. p..<\/p>\n

Leigusalinn \u00e1stand var fullkomin fr\u00e1 hagn\u00fdtur sj\u00f3narmi\u00f0i, \u00fea\u00f0 er, fjarverandi si\u00f0fer\u00f0ilega Litbrig\u00f0i sem samf\u00e9lag okkar er nota\u00f0 og lof, \u00feannig a\u00f0 \u00e1stand \u00fe\u00fa haldi\u00f0 innri tengsl vi\u00f0 g\u00f3\u00f0a hugmynd.<\/p>\n

Friedrich Nietzsche \u00ed starfi s\u00ednu „\u00e6ttartr\u00e9 si\u00f0fer\u00f0i“, ger\u00f0i eftirfarandi athugasemd: „… a\u00f0 meina n\u00e1kv\u00e6mlega, fr\u00e1 etymological sj\u00f3narmi\u00f0i, a\u00f0 tilnefningar til“ gott „myntsl\u00e1ttuma\u00f0ur af \u00fdmsum tungum\u00e1lum? \u00c9g fann \u00fe\u00e1 \u00fat a\u00f0 \u00feeir v\u00edsa til sama hugl\u00e6gu umbreytingu – a\u00f0 alls sta\u00f0ar, „g\u00f6fugt ‘,’ aristocratic“ \u00ed f\u00e9lagslega skilningi, er grunn hugmyndin sem endilega \u00fer\u00f3a\u00f0 ‘g\u00f3\u00f0ur’, a\u00f0 ‘andlega g\u00f6fugt ‘,’ aristocratic ‘\u00far’ andlega vel f\u00e6ddur „,“ andlega forr\u00e9ttinda „: a \u00fer\u00f3un sem alltaf liggur sams\u00ed\u00f0a s\u00ed\u00f0arnefnda gera ‘algengari’, ‘sameiginlega’, ‘l\u00e1gt“ er transmuted loksins „sl\u00e6ma“ „<\/em><\/span>Nietzsche Friedrich, si\u00f0fer\u00f0ileg Genealogy – A deilur, Translation Paulo C\u00e9sar de Souza, Sao Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2009. Page 18 ..<\/p>\n

\u00de\u00fd\u00f0a gr\u00edska or\u00f0inu agathos fyrir ‘gott’ vegna umbreytingu merkingu \u00ed gegnum aldirnar veltur \u00fe\u00e1 hugmynd a\u00f0 Bibl\u00edan kynnir, til gr\u00edska or\u00f0inu ‘agathos „vegna Bibl\u00edunni samhengi sem \u00fea\u00f0 starfar, \u00e6tti a\u00f0 \u00fe\u00fd\u00f0a sem“ g\u00f6fugt „vegna \u00feess a\u00f0 etymological r\u00f3t or\u00f0sins ‘agathos’ einn sem er, sem hefur veruleika, hva\u00f0 er raunverulegur, sannur“ \u00fe\u00fd\u00f0ir. Var\u00f0andi hugtaki\u00f0, Nietzsche fullyr\u00f0ir a\u00f0 jafnvel me\u00f0 tilliti til hugl\u00e6grar breytingu or\u00f0 \u00fe\u00fd\u00f0ir „alv\u00f6ru eins yndi. Hugtaki\u00f0 var nota\u00f0 til a\u00f0 bera Einkunnaror\u00f0 a\u00f0alsmanna, \u00ed \u00fev\u00ed skyni a\u00f0 greina g\u00f6fugt af sameiginlegum ma\u00f0ur, lygari (Jaeger, PAIDEIA, p. 19).<\/p>\n

Hva\u00f0 er merking „s\u00f6nn“ \u00feegar \u00fea\u00f0 les: „Fyr engan; alltaf l\u00e1ta Gu\u00f0 vera satt og hver ma\u00f0ur lygari; eins og \u00fea\u00f0 er skrifa\u00f0, a\u00f0 \u00fe\u00fa megir vera r\u00e9ttl\u00e6tanleg \u00ed or\u00f0um \u00fe\u00ednum og m\u00e6ttir sigrast \u00feegar \u00fe\u00fa ert d\u00e6mdur „<\/span>(Rm 3: 4). E\u00f0a, hva\u00f0 er merking ‘lygari „? \u00cd \u00feessu versi, merkingu ‘sanna’ og ‘lygari’ eigin si\u00f0fer\u00f0ilegum connotation? V\u00edsar til e\u00f0li einstaklingsins? Vinsamlegast athugi\u00f0:<\/p>\n

„Og \u00dej\u00f3narnir f\u00f3ru \u00fat \u00e1 vegina og s\u00f6fnu\u00f0u \u00f6llum, sem \u00feeir fundu, vondum og g\u00f3\u00f0um, og gifting var b\u00fain me\u00f0 gestum“<\/span> (Mt 22:10);<\/p>\n

Hvernig \u00e1 a\u00f0 t\u00falka d\u00e6mis\u00f6gu? The illt og gott a\u00f0 \u00fer\u00e6lar f\u00e6rt fyrirm\u00e6lum h\u00fasb\u00f3nda s\u00edns hefur si\u00f0fer\u00f0ilega merkingu? Ekki! \u00cd textanum, sl\u00e6mt og gott hefur vit \u00e1 ‘vi\u00f0urstyggilega’ og ‘g\u00f6fugt’, ‘l\u00edtill’ og ‘st\u00f3r’, fyrir Drottni d\u00e6mis\u00f6gunni er ekki \u00ed manngreinar\u00e1lit.<\/p>\n

„Hann veldur s\u00f3l s\u00edna renna upp yfir vonda sem g\u00f3\u00f0a og rigna yfir r\u00e9ttl\u00e1ta sem rangl\u00e1ta“<\/span> (Mt 05:45).<\/p>\n

\u00cd fjallr\u00e6\u00f0unni, sem skilningi gott og sl\u00e6mt? N\u00fa vitum vi\u00f0 a\u00f0 Gu\u00f0 er ekki \u00ed manngreinar\u00e1lit, og a\u00f0 s\u00f3lin r\u00eds yfir tignarmenn og al\u00fe\u00fd\u00f0unnar, r\u00e9ttl\u00e1ta sem rangl\u00e1ta, \u00feannig a\u00f0 merking „sl\u00e6mt“ or\u00f0 og ‘gott’ er ekki h\u00e6gt a\u00f0 t\u00falka \u00e1 si\u00f0fer\u00f0ilegu skilningi.<\/p>\n

„L\u00edkaminn er lampi augum; \u00feannig a\u00f0 ef auga \u00feitt er gott, allur l\u00edkami \u00feinn mun vera bjart; En ef auga \u00feitt er sl\u00e6mt, l\u00edkami \u00feinn er dimmur „<\/span>(Mt 06:22 -23).<\/p>\n

Augun geta veri\u00f0 si\u00f0fer\u00f0ilega sl\u00e6mt e\u00f0a gott? E\u00f0a tilfinningu „sl\u00e6mt“ og „gott“ er \u00e1tt vi\u00f0 hugmynd af einfaldur, algengar, andst\u00e6\u00f0ur me\u00f0 g\u00f3\u00f0a hugmynd, eru g\u00f6fugt? The Barclay fr\u00e9ttask\u00fdrandi m\u00e6lir \u00fe\u00fd\u00f0a „gott“ af \u00f6rl\u00e1tur, er hins vegar ekki r\u00e9tt \u00fe\u00fd\u00f0ing, vegna \u00feess a\u00f0 hugmyndin um \u00f6rl\u00e1tur \u00e1tt vi\u00f0 rausn \u00e1 tignarmenn gera hva\u00f0 sem \u00feeir vildu me\u00f0 \u00fev\u00ed tilheyr\u00f0i \u00feeim „Fyrir a hollari frumtexta vi\u00f0 \u00fe\u00fd\u00f0a h\u00e9r \u00f6rl\u00e1tur \u00ed g\u00f3\u00f0um sta\u00f0 e\u00f0a einf\u00f6ld. Jes\u00fas lof \u00f6rl\u00e1tur auga „<\/em><\/span>Barclay, William, Commentary \u00e1 N\u00fdja testamentinu. P. 264.<\/p>\n

\u00deess vegna, eftirfarandi lei\u00f0:<\/p>\n

„Er \u00fea\u00f0 ekki leyfilegt fyrir mig a\u00f0 gera \u00fea\u00f0 sem \u00fe\u00fa vilt \u00fea\u00f0 er mitt? E\u00f0a er auga illt \u00feitt vegna \u00feess a\u00f0 \u00e9g er g\u00f3\u00f0ur?“<\/span> (Mt 20:15)<\/p>\n

\u00cd lj\u00f3si \u00feess a\u00f0 rausn sem var sj\u00e1lf a\u00f0 ‘g\u00f3\u00f0ur’ gera sem s\u00e1u passa vi\u00f0 \u00fea\u00f0 sem \u00e1tti vi\u00f0 \u00fe\u00e1, g\u00f6fuga vi\u00f0komandi \u00e1v\u00edtur starfsmenn sem ritsko\u00f0u\u00f0 ath\u00f6fn hans. Samkv\u00e6mt mati ma\u00f0ur okkar t\u00edma, heg\u00f0un vinnuveitanda er despaut\u00e9rio vegna \u00feess a\u00f0 hann equates starfsmenn a\u00f0 veita s\u00f6mu laun til allra \u00e1n tillits til vinnut\u00edma hvers \u00fe\u00f3 \u00ed samr\u00e6mi vi\u00f0 framt\u00ed\u00f0ars\u00fdn mannsins \u00e1 \u00feeim t\u00edma Krists a\u00f0 despaut\u00e9rio kemur upp \u00feegar sameiginlegur ma\u00f0ur skorar \u00e1 rausn \u00e1 g\u00f6fugt „Fyrir \u00feremur hlutum j\u00f6r\u00f0in er disquieted; og fj\u00f6gur sem getur ekki bori\u00f0: Fyrir \u00fej\u00f3n \u00feegar hann or\u00f0inn konungur; og gu\u00f0lausum manni, \u00feegar hann mettast kj\u00f6ti; Fyrir odious konu \u00feegar h\u00fan er gift; og amb\u00e1tt sem er arftaki h\u00fasm\u00f3\u00f0ur s\u00edna „<\/span>(Ok 30:21 -23).<\/p>\n

Jaeger greina lj\u00f3\u00f0 Theognis skr\u00e1: „Sk\u00e1ldi\u00f0 r\u00e1\u00f0leggur a\u00f0 for\u00f0ast a\u00f0 takast \u00e1 vi\u00f0 sl\u00e6mt (Kakoi), \u00fear sem sk\u00e1ldi\u00f0 n\u00e6r til allra sem tilheyra ekki g\u00f6fugt f\u00e6\u00f0ingu; \u00e1 hinn b\u00f3ginn er einnig, g\u00f6fugt (agathos) er a\u00f0eins a\u00f0 finna me\u00f0al jafnaldra \u00feeirra „<\/span><\/em>(Jaeger, PAIDEIA, 244).<\/p>\n

\u00deegar ger\u00f0 greining \u00e1 Bibl\u00edunni texta, \u00e6tti ekki a\u00f0 takmarkast vi\u00f0 a\u00f0 nota a\u00f0eins merkingu a\u00f0 skilm\u00e1lar hafa \u00ed dag, \u00fe\u00f6kk s\u00e9 h\u00f6nnun sem samf\u00e9lag okkar prentu\u00f0 \u00e1kve\u00f0num skilm\u00e1lum.<\/p>\n

Einnig \u00feegar vi\u00f0 lesum tiltekin hugt\u00f6k \u00ed Bibl\u00edunni, ver\u00f0um vi\u00f0 a\u00f0 skilja \u00fe\u00e1 me\u00f0 augum samf\u00e9lagsins \u00e1 \u00feeim t\u00edma, og fl\u00fdja fr\u00e1 heimss\u00fdn i\u00f0n vi\u00f0 heimspekilegar meginreglum t\u00edma fyrir m\u00e1li\u00f0 a\u00f0 heimspekingar t\u00edma geta s\u00e9r haf\u00f0i engin \u00e1hrif, ekki einu sinni ma\u00f0urinn \u00feess f\u00e9lags, var einu sinni \u00e1 svi\u00f0i sj\u00e1lfum a\u00f0ra verufr\u00e6\u00f0ilega, svo langt fr\u00e1 n\u00fat\u00edmaumhverfi\u00f0 \u00fdtir undir h\u00f6nnun \u00e1 Bibl\u00edunni rith\u00f6funda.<\/p>\n

\u00de\u00f3 samf\u00e9lagi\u00f0 skilgreind hluti \u00ed hagn\u00fdtur skilm\u00e1lum, heimspekingar eins Platon, f\u00f3r a\u00f0 spyrja spurninga um e\u00f0li veru, veruleika, um tilvist verur og frumspekilegur spurningum, og \u00fe\u00e1 \u00feekkingu sem var a\u00f0 framlei\u00f0a \u00e1 \u00feeim t\u00edma, haf\u00f0i si\u00f0fer\u00f0islega byr\u00f0i og si\u00f0fr\u00e6\u00f0i, sem var ekki enn reynslu af samf\u00e9laginu.<\/p>\n

Jaeger fullyr\u00f0ir a\u00f0 Hugt\u00f6kin „arete ‘og’ gott ‘\u00ed Grikklandi hinu forna, haf\u00f0i ekki connotation si\u00f0vit, \u00feess vegna spurningu: \u00deegar \u00feessi hugt\u00f6k eru n\u00fa notu\u00f0 me\u00f0 si\u00f0fer\u00f0ilegum connotation? \u00deegar heimspekingar eins og S\u00f3krates og Platon, \u00ed gegnum vangaveltur \u00feekkingar og v\u00edsinda, heimspeki unni\u00f0 si\u00f0fer\u00f0ilegan r\u00f6\u00f0 vegna \u00feess a\u00f0 \u00fea\u00f0 er v\u00edsindi sem veltir \u00fe\u00e6tti og vandam\u00e1l sj\u00e1lfum a\u00f0ra verufr\u00e6\u00f0ilega r\u00f6\u00f0.<\/p>\n

\u00de\u00f3 a\u00f0 \u00ed S\u00f3krates vangaveltur var takm\u00f6rku\u00f0 vi\u00f0 sj\u00e1lfum a\u00f0ra verufr\u00e6\u00f0ilega og si\u00f0fer\u00f0ism\u00e1lum, Platon t\u00f3k \u00fe\u00e1tt \u00ed veginum frumspeki og heimsfr\u00e6\u00f0i. \u00cd Platon bl\u00f3mstra\u00f0i \u00e1 h\u00faman\u00edska heimspeki, tr\u00fa og moralistic. \u00dea\u00f0 hefur veri\u00f0 \u00ed verkum Platons margt af \u00fev\u00ed er tilkynnt af spiritualists og ka\u00fe\u00f3likka, eins og the hugmynd af endurholdgun og Purgatory.<\/p>\n

The ‘g\u00f3\u00f0ur’ sem tilnefnt \u00e1 tignarmenn, var n\u00fdtt nafn gott, tilvali\u00f0 heiminum, heimurinn hugmynda. Spurning um Platon leiddi byltingu \u00e1 hugt\u00f6kum, \u00fe\u00f3 f\u00f3lki\u00f0 hans dag og eftirfarandi kynsl\u00f3\u00f0ir, hefur ekki breyst strax til \u00e6fingar. \u00deegar Jes\u00fas kom, svo heimspekilegur hugtak var ekki enn hluti af f\u00f3lki, s\u00e9rstaklega \u00feeim sem nota\u00f0i Koine gr\u00edsku.<\/p>\n

St\u00e6rsta vandam\u00e1li\u00f0 kom upp me\u00f0 hugmyndafr\u00e6\u00f0i \u00fer\u00f3a\u00f0 me\u00f0 fyrstu prestarnir, Patristic. \u00deegar b\u00fai\u00f0 helgisi\u00f0um, greinum, si\u00f0i osfrv, amalgamating platonsku hugmyndir og s\u00f3krat\u00edsku sag\u00f0i vi\u00f0 kristna kenningu. \u00cd fyrstu \u00f6ld, sj\u00e1um vi\u00f0 sterka si\u00f0fer\u00f0ilega og dogmatic \u00dev\u00ed stefna, sk\u00fdr \u00e1hrif ascetic venja.<\/p>\n

\u00de\u00fa getur fengi\u00f0 verri? Jamm! Rotterdam Erasmus me\u00f0 S\u00f3krates sem fyrirfram Christian p\u00edslarvottur, svo hann ba\u00f0, „Sancte Socrates, Ora pro Nobis“<\/em><\/span> (Jaeger, PAIDEIA, 493). Jaeger bendir \u00e1 a\u00f0 me\u00f0 \u00fev\u00ed a\u00f0 heittr\u00faarstefnan h\u00fasa upp \u00ed S\u00f3krates vopn, \u00fev\u00ed a\u00f0 \u00feeir s\u00e1u \u00ed henni \u00e1kve\u00f0in andleg skyldleiki (Ibid, p. 494). Hva\u00f0 um Augustine, sem var byggt \u00e1 hugsunum Platons?<\/p>\n

Eins og Jes\u00fas kenndi sig a\u00f0 vera lei\u00f0 sem lei\u00f0ir mann til Gu\u00f0s, kristni s\u00e1 platonsku heimspeki \u00e1 nau\u00f0syn \u00feess a\u00f0 halda aftur af heimsins lystisemda, a\u00f0 leggja i\u00f0kun sem austere l\u00edfsst\u00edl, elta starfsh\u00e6tti teknar af virtuous \u00ed \u00fev\u00ed skyni a\u00f0 afla s\u00e9r andlega meiri. Dai, margir prestar byrju\u00f0u a\u00f0 ascetic hugsj\u00f3n, a\u00f0 \u00e6tla a\u00f0 hreinsun l\u00edkamans myndi hj\u00e1lpa \u00ed hreinsun s\u00e1larinnar.<\/p>\n

Fr\u00e1 \u00feeim t\u00edma, \u00ed hvert skipti sem \u00fe\u00fa gerir tilv\u00edsun \u00ed Gu\u00f0s sem „gott“, textinn er gegndreypt me\u00f0 hugmynd af si\u00f0fer\u00f0ilegum fullkomnun, \u00e1n tillits til \u00feess a\u00f0 hann er Drottinn. \u00deetta er \u00fear sem \u00fdmsar spurningar vakna: Ef Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur, hvers vegna er \u00fea\u00f0 illt?<\/p>\n

Sl\u00edkar spurningar mi\u00f0ar a\u00f0 \u00fev\u00ed a\u00f0 blinda manninn ekki a\u00f0 sj\u00e1 sannleikann. Eins spurning um Satan \u00ed Eden lag\u00f0i \u00e1herslu auki\u00f0 bann \u00e1 kostna\u00f0 frelsis veitt (Gen. 3: 1), spurningin, „ef Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur, hvers vegna er \u00fea\u00f0 illt“, gefur tilefni til andst\u00e6\u00f0ur \u00ed raun ekki um meint m\u00f3tsagnir eru aflei\u00f0ing af misreading \u00e1 Bibl\u00edunni og s\u00f6gulegt samhengi hennar.<\/p>\n

Markmi\u00f0 \u00feessarar greinar er a\u00f0 s\u00fdna fram \u00e1 a\u00f0 Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur, \u00e1n tillits til \u00feess a\u00f0 hann \u00feyrmdi l\u00fd\u00f0 N\u00edn\u00edve e\u00f0a succumb gert S\u00f3d\u00f3mu og G\u00f3morru vi\u00f0 \u00fe\u00fasundir saklausra barna (M\u00f3seb\u00f3k 19:25; Jh 4:11). Sl\u00edkir atbur\u00f0ir ekki mischaracterize n\u00e9 l\u00fdsa Gu\u00f0 Bibl\u00edunnar sem „gott“ e\u00f0a „illt“.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00dea\u00f0 er ekkert gott en eitt, \u00fea\u00f0 er Gu\u00f0<\/u><\/strong><\/h2>\n

„Jes\u00fas sag\u00f0i vi\u00f0 hann:, Hv\u00ed kallar \u00fe\u00fa mig g\u00f3\u00f0an a\u00f0 \u00fea\u00f0 er ekkert gott en eitt, \u00fea\u00f0 er Gu\u00f0?“<\/span> (L\u00fak 18:19)<\/p>\n

\u00deegar Jes\u00fas segir categorically: „\u00dea\u00f0 er enginn g\u00f3\u00f0ur en einn, \u00fea\u00f0 er Gu\u00f0,“<\/span> <\/em>var l\u00f6g\u00f0 \u00e1hersla \u00e1 a\u00f0 kynna sj\u00e1lfum a\u00f0ra verufr\u00e6\u00f0ilega svar vi\u00f0 \u00fev\u00ed vandam\u00e1li a\u00f0 illu? The fullyr\u00f0ingu „Enginn er g\u00f3\u00f0ur, nema einn, sem er Gu\u00f0“ er \u00e1tt vi\u00f0 spurningunni um heimspekilega r\u00f6\u00f0?<\/p>\n

\u00c9g segi nei! Jes\u00fas var ekki a\u00f0 reyna a\u00f0 heimspekilegar spurningar sem e\u00f0li a\u00f0 vera, veruleika, tilvist elska\u00f0i n\u00e9 \u00e1 frumspekilegur spurningum.<\/p>\n

En \u00feegar vi\u00f0 segjum, „Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur“, fyrsta spurningin h\u00e6kka\u00f0ir um nemendur er: „Ef Gu\u00f0 er ‘alm\u00e1ttugur’ og ‘g\u00f3\u00f0ur, og setja \u00feessa spurningu \u00ed“, me\u00f0 \u00fev\u00ed a\u00f0 leyfa tilvist illsku og \u00fej\u00e1ningar? „a palli sem erfi\u00f0ustu spurningu s\u00f6gu kristinnar gu\u00f0fr\u00e6\u00f0i.<\/p>\n

Er \u00fea\u00f0 \u00e1s\u00e6ttanlegt fyrir utan kristna stendur \u00fevers\u00f6gn, eins og raunin er \u00e1 Epicurean \u00fevers\u00f6gn. Hvers vegna \u00e1s\u00e6ttanlegt? \u00dev\u00ed hver m\u00f3tu\u00f0 \u00fevers\u00f6gn \u00f3kunnugt um e\u00f0li Gu\u00f0s! Epik\u00faros sag\u00f0i a\u00f0 Gu\u00f0 og illt getur ekki \u00ferifist ef Gu\u00f0 er alvitur, alm\u00e1ttugur og benevolent, en Gu\u00f0 sj\u00e1lfur segir er a\u00f0 vita gott og illt „Og Drottinn Gu\u00f0 sag\u00f0i: Sj\u00e1, ma\u00f0urinn er or\u00f0inn sem einn af oss, vitandi gott og illt „<\/span>(Gen. 3:22).<\/p>\n

Gu\u00f0 er Drottinn, g\u00f6fugt, \u00fea\u00f0 er, gott og vita skyn g\u00f3\u00f0s og ills, \u00fev\u00ed a\u00f0 hann er Drottinn mun umbuna alla menn, og gefa g\u00f3\u00f0a sj\u00e1lfur og illt til annarra, allt eftir sem leitu\u00f0u „Hver mun gera hver ma\u00f0ur eftir verkum hans; nefnilega: The eil\u00edft l\u00edf \u00feeim sem sj\u00faklings framhaldi vel a\u00f0 gera a\u00f0 leita til d\u00fdr\u00f0ar og hei\u00f0urs og \u00f3dau\u00f0leika, En rei\u00f0i og rei\u00f0i \u00fe\u00e1 sem eru umdeildar, hl\u00fd\u00f0a sannleikanum, en hl\u00fd\u00f0a rangl\u00e6ti; \u00derenging og angist, a\u00f0 s\u00e9rhver s\u00e1l mannsins sem gj\u00f6rir illt; Gy\u00f0ingurinn fyrst og einnig a\u00f0 gr\u00edsku; En vegsemd, hei\u00f0ur og fri\u00f0 vi\u00f0 alla sem gerir gott; a\u00f0 Gy\u00f0ingum fyrst og einnig til gr\u00edsku; Vegna \u00feess, a\u00f0 Gu\u00f0, \u00fea\u00f0 er ekki \u00ed manngreinar\u00e1lit „<\/span>(Rm 2: 6 -11).<\/p>\n

Gu\u00f0 er Drottinn, Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur og \u00e1 sama t\u00edma, er hann g\u00f3\u00f0ur og alvarlega „Sj\u00e1 \u00fear me\u00f0 g\u00e6sku og alvarleika Gu\u00f0s: \u00e1 \u00feeim sem f\u00e9ll, alvarleika, en \u00e1tt \u00fe\u00e9r, g\u00f3\u00f0vild, ef \u00fe\u00fa heldur \u00e1fram \u00ed g\u00e6sku sinni : annars \u00fe\u00fa einnig skalt skera burt „<\/span>(R\u00f3mverjabr\u00e9fi\u00f0 11:22), \u00fea\u00f0 er, \u00fea\u00f0 er Gu\u00f0, sem innleiddi refsingu fyrir \u00e1r\u00e1sarmanna, svo \u00fea\u00f0 er sagt,“ \u00e9g mynda lj\u00f3s og skapa myrkur, \u00e9g veiti heill og veld \u00f3hamingju \u00e9g, Drottinn, sem gj\u00f6ri allt \u00feetta „(er 45: 7).<\/p>\n

\u00cd hva\u00f0a skilningi Gu\u00f0 skapar illt? \u00cd \u00fev\u00ed skyni a\u00f0 retribution, r\u00e9ttl\u00e6ti, svo reciprocates me\u00f0 hreinu g\u00f3\u00f0vild og st\u00edfni rangsn\u00fana a\u00f0 „Drottinn launa m\u00e9r eftir r\u00e9ttl\u00e6ti m\u00ednu, eftir hreinleik minn \u00ed augum hans. Me\u00f0 miskunnsamir, g\u00f3\u00f0kynja s\u00fdnir \u00fe\u00e9r; me\u00f0 uppr\u00e9tta manni muntu s\u00fdna. Me\u00f0 hreint \u00fe\u00fa s\u00fdnir sj\u00e1lfur hreint; en me\u00f0 illu \u00fe\u00fa har\u00f0a s\u00fdnir „<\/span>(2 Samuel 22:25 -27); „Me\u00f0 miskunnsamir \u00fe\u00fa s\u00fdna g\u00f3\u00f0kynja og me\u00f0 uppr\u00e9ttri ma\u00f0ur \u00fe\u00fa vilt s\u00fdn \u00feig einl\u00e6g“<\/span> (Sl 18:25).<\/p>\n

\u00deetta var sta\u00f0a meistara: „Sem svar, \u00fe\u00f3 h\u00fasb\u00f3ndinn sag\u00f0i vi\u00f0 hann:, \u00de\u00fa \u00f3gu\u00f0legra og lati \u00fej\u00f3nn; \u00de\u00fa vissir, a\u00f0 \u00e9g uppsker \u00fear sem \u00e9g s\u00e1\u00f0i ekki, og safna \u00fear, sem \u00e9g vissi ekki dreifa? \u00de\u00fa \u00e6ttir \u00fe\u00e1 hafa gefi\u00f0 peningana m\u00edna til exchangers og koma \u00e9g \u00e6tti a\u00f0 hafa fengi\u00f0 minn eigin me\u00f0 Okur „<\/span>(Matt 25:26 -27). \u00deeir sem eru g\u00f3\u00f0ir \u00fej\u00f3nar, n\u00e1\u00f0, a\u00f0 sl\u00e6mt, ystu myrkur.<\/p>\n

\u00deetta er sta\u00f0a Krists: „\u00deegar Mannssonurinn kemur \u00ed d\u00fdr\u00f0 sinni og allir englar me\u00f0 honum, \u00fe\u00e1 mun hann sitja \u00ed d\u00fdr\u00f0arh\u00e1s\u00e6ti s\u00ednu: Og allar \u00fej\u00f3\u00f0ir munu safnast frammi fyrir honum, og einn fr\u00e1 \u00f6\u00f0rum, eins og hir\u00f0ir skilur sau\u00f0i fr\u00e1 h\u00f6frum (…) Og \u00feetta mun fara \u00ed eil\u00edfa refsingu, en hinir r\u00e9ttl\u00e1tu til eil\u00edfs l\u00edfs „<\/span>(Matt 31-32 og 46).<\/p>\n

\u00deegar Jes\u00fas b\u00fd\u00f0ur: „Komi\u00f0 til m\u00edn, allir \u00fe\u00e9r sem erfi\u00f0i hafi\u00f0 og \u00feungar byr\u00f0ar, og \u00e9g mun veita y\u00f0ur hv\u00edld. Taktu \u00e1 y\u00f0ur mitt ok og l\u00e6ri\u00f0 af m\u00e9r, \u00fev\u00ed a\u00f0 \u00e9g er h\u00f3gv\u00e6r og af hjarta l\u00edtill\u00e1tur; og munu\u00f0 \u00fe\u00e9r finna hv\u00edld s\u00e1lum y\u00f0ar. \u00dev\u00ed a\u00f0 mitt ok er lj\u00faft og byr\u00f0i m\u00edn l\u00e9tt „<\/span>(Mt 11:28 -30), the leikma\u00f0ur me\u00f0 st\u00e6rri mynd mun sj\u00e1 Krist sem“ gott „,“ \u00fe\u00fa „,“ g\u00f6fugt „og \u00e1 sama t\u00edma, benevolent, fyrir \u00fe\u00e1 sem eru h\u00e1\u00f0 honum \u00feeir eru gefnir me\u00f0 l\u00e9tta byr\u00f0i.<\/p>\n

\u00cd var\u00f0bergi, „\u00e9g skapa illt,“ hafa tilv\u00edsun \u00ed \u00fe\u00e1 sta\u00f0reynd a\u00f0 Gu\u00f0 hefur vaki\u00f0 nokkrar n\u00e1l\u00e6gum \u00fej\u00f3\u00f0um eins stangir lei\u00f0r\u00e9ttingar, til \u00feess a\u00f0 gefa \u00cdsraelsm\u00f6nnum skilja \u00fe\u00f6rfina \u00e1 a\u00f0 breyta (Jesaja 1: 5), \u00fe\u00f3 \u00fer\u00e1tt refsa \u00cdsraelsm\u00f6nnum, Gu\u00f0 er r\u00e9ttl\u00e1tur og eins vara\u00f0, beitt refsingu fyrir rei\u00f0i.<\/p>\n

\u00cd \u00f6\u00f0ru lagi, utan hj\u00e1lpr\u00e6\u00f0i og fjandanum mun Gu\u00f0 l\u00e1ta hverjum manni samkv\u00e6mt verkum hans.<\/p>\n

\u00deegar Gu\u00f0 skapa\u00f0i manninn gaf honum \u00e1kv\u00f6r\u00f0unarvald. Eins gjafir Gu\u00f0s eru \u00f3afturkr\u00e6f, jafnvel eftir synd, ma\u00f0urinn \u00e1fram \u00ed eigu frelsi \u00feeirra til a\u00f0 \u00e1kve\u00f0a, vegna \u00feess a\u00f0 drottna yfir j\u00f6r\u00f0inni var gefi\u00f0 m\u00f6nnum. N\u00fa \u00feegar Gu\u00f0 var\u00f0 ma\u00f0ur og aftur sigurs\u00e6ll til himins, kalla\u00f0i eftir: \u00fea\u00f0 er gefi\u00f0 m\u00e9r allt vald \u00e1 himni og j\u00f6r\u00f0u!<\/p>\n

Eins og menn eru \u00f3keypis og hafa vald yfir j\u00f6r\u00f0inni, sem getur gert og \u00feeir \u00fe\u00f3knast. \u00dea\u00f0 er annars sta\u00f0ar, eins og ma\u00f0urinn hefur or\u00f0i\u00f0 eins og Gu\u00f0 og vita skyn g\u00f3\u00f0s og ills, einnig hefur getu til a\u00f0 greina a\u00f0ger\u00f0ir f\u00e9laga sinna og samskipti g\u00f3\u00f0s og ills.<\/p>\n

The vandam\u00e1l af hinu illa kemur upp \u00feegar ma\u00f0ur saknar r\u00e9ttl\u00e6tiskennd, og skal gera illt til \u00e1n\u00e6gju. Hugmyndin um retribution er sett til hli\u00f0ar, og ma\u00f0urinn a\u00f0 sortna \u00ed skilning kastar \u00ed raun hinu illa. \u00de\u00f3 a\u00f0 \u00e9g veit a\u00f0ger\u00f0ir sl\u00edkra einstaklinga, Gu\u00f0 er ekki gr\u00edpa, fyrir alla menn \u00feegar kynnt \u00ed heiminum eru undir d\u00f3m og eins og Gu\u00f0, g\u00f3\u00f0s og ills connoisseurs.<\/p>\n

En gott og illt voru kynntar \u00ed Eden \u00ed gegnum \u00e1vexti, svo a\u00f0 gott og illt eru \u00f3a\u00f0skiljanleg. The gott og illt eru samsetningar sem gefur brag\u00f0 \u00e1vexti. Eru tv\u00e6r hli\u00f0ar \u00e1 sama peningi.<\/p>\n

Skilningur \u00feessa veruleika? \u00deegar foreldri kennir barn og lei\u00f0r\u00e9ttir lei\u00f0r\u00e9tting sumum \u00fe\u00e6tti hefur \u00fatliti illt, \u00fe\u00f3 fa\u00f0ir leitar v\u00f6runar. Hefur einhver gefur \u00f6lmusu vir\u00f0ist vera a\u00f0 gera vel, \u00fe\u00f3 svo ath\u00f6fn perpetuates eymd \u00feeirra sem b\u00faa \u00e1 \u00f6lmusu, sem \u00ed raun er illt. Sl\u00edk d\u00e6mi s\u00fdna a\u00f0 gott og illt eru \u00f3a\u00f0skiljanleg.<\/p>\n

Samkv\u00e6mt Bibl\u00edunni, r\u00e9ttl\u00e6ti Gu\u00f0s er ekki h\u00e6gt og ekki hrun, vegna \u00feess a\u00f0 r\u00e9ttl\u00e6ti Gu\u00f0s var starfr\u00e6kt \u00e1 fyrsta afbrot og svo a\u00f0 allir menn voru d\u00e6mdir, \u00f3h\u00e1\u00f0 gj\u00f6r\u00f0um s\u00ednum. Hins vegar \u00ed tengslum vi\u00f0 daglegu a\u00f0ger\u00f0ir, mun Gu\u00f0 spyrja reikning hvern Mann, hvort r\u00e9tt e\u00f0a \u00f3r\u00e9ttl\u00e1tt, og \u00ed \u00fev\u00ed sambandi er ekki manngreinar\u00e1lit. Fyrir bara svona reikningi ver\u00f0ur sett fyrir d\u00f3mst\u00f3li Krists, og me\u00f0 rangl\u00e1ta, a\u00f0 miki\u00f0 hv\u00edtt h\u00e1s\u00e6ti.<\/p>\n

P\u00e1ll postuli vara\u00f0i kristnir sem l\u00e1ta ekki \u00fe\u00fa eiga til heimspekilegra \u00e1st\u00e6\u00f0a til en hva\u00f0 anna\u00f0 vi\u00f0 finnum \u00ed gu\u00f0fr\u00e6\u00f0i, hvort samt\u00edmalist e\u00f0a klass\u00edk, eru m\u00e1lefni eftir the \u00f3\u00feroska\u00f0 l\u00edff\u00e6ri af the ver\u00f6ld „Varist svo einhver svindla \u00fe\u00e9r gegnum heimspeki og einskis blekkingum, eftir hef\u00f0 karla, eftir the \u00f3\u00feroska\u00f0 l\u00edff\u00e6ri af the ver\u00f6ld, og ekki eftir Krist „<\/span>(Col 2: 8).<\/p>\n

Hvers vegna s\u00f6k \u00ed heimspeki, margir kristnir halda \u00fev\u00ed \u00feessi m\u00e1l eru afetas sem tr\u00fair \u00e1 alm\u00e1ttugur og elska Gu\u00f0 „Strangt til teki\u00f0, manna eymd, e\u00f0a illt \u00ed \u00f6llum myndum \u00feess er vandam\u00e1l a\u00f0eins fyrir mann sem tr\u00fair \u00e1 Gu\u00f0 eini, allur-\u00f6flugur og allt elskandi „<\/em><\/span>Anderson, Francis I. vitna\u00f0 Luiz Say\u00e3o \u00ed ‘Ef Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur, hvers vegna er \u00fea\u00f0 illt?“ atri\u00f0i \u00ed bo\u00f0i \u00e1 vefnum.<\/p>\n

\u00dea\u00f0 sem vi\u00f0 sj\u00e1um er a\u00f0 \u00fea\u00f0 eru margir gu\u00f0fr\u00e6\u00f0ingar sem eru talsmenn Gu\u00f0s, heldur \u00f3kunnugt um or\u00f0 hans. Verra en kristnir vopn skal takmarkast vi\u00f0 or\u00f0i Gu\u00f0s vegna \u00feess a\u00f0 \u00fea\u00f0 er h\u00e6gt a\u00f0 ey\u00f0ileggja v\u00edgi sl\u00edkar fr\u00e6\u00f0imenn eru \u00ed eigu vopnum \u00ed bo\u00f0i af heiminum „Fyrir vopn herna\u00f0i eru ekki jar\u00f0nesk, heldur m\u00e1ttug Gu\u00f0 fyrir a\u00f0 toga ni\u00f0ur v\u00edgi „<\/span>(2 Kor 10: 4; 2 Corinthians 6: 7; R\u00f3mverjabr\u00e9fi\u00f0 13:12).<\/p>\n

Me\u00f0 \u00feokus\u00fdn vegna n\u00fat\u00edma framk\u00f6llun, sumir \u00fe\u00fd\u00f0endur voru kn\u00fainn til a\u00f0 nota hugtaki\u00f0 „gott“ \u00ed sta\u00f0 „g\u00f6fugt“. Breyta ‘g\u00f6fugt’ \u00ed ‘gott’ uppn\u00e1mi texta hugmynd. Fargi\u00f0 etymological r\u00f3t hugtakinu „agathos ‘, sem \u00fe\u00fd\u00f0ir“ s\u00e1 sem er, sem hefur veruleika, hva\u00f0 er raunverulegt, s\u00f6nn „, f\u00e6r\u00f0u tj\u00f3n a\u00f0 skilja textann.<\/p>\n

\u00deegar vi\u00f0 segjum a\u00f0 Gu\u00f0 er Noble, Sir, Good, vi\u00f0 erum a\u00f0 tj\u00e1 sem Drottinn Gu\u00f0s og uppgj\u00f6f okkar til hans. Gu\u00f0 er \u00e9g, sem er, sem hefur veruleika, sem er raunveruleg, alv\u00f6ru, hugtak yfirbur\u00f0i a\u00f0 finna \u00ed or\u00f0ab\u00e6kur okkar. Me\u00f0 \u00feessa hugmynd a\u00f0 hugtaki\u00f0 „agathos“, the hugtak, hugmynd, fr\u00e1 setningu „Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur“ transmutes og sendir einstakt merkingu.<\/p>\n

\u00deegar vi\u00f0 teljum a\u00f0 Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur, g\u00f6fugur, fr\u00e6gur, Drottinn, fa\u00f0ir, \u00fea\u00f0 er engin m\u00f3ts\u00f6gn milli alvarleika og g\u00f3\u00f0vild „Sj\u00e1i\u00f0 \u00fear me\u00f0 g\u00e6sku og alvarleika Gu\u00f0s: \u00e1 \u00feeim sem f\u00e9ll, alvarleika, en til ykkar, g\u00f3\u00f0vild, ef \u00fe\u00fa heldur \u00e1fram \u00ed g\u00e6sku sinni: annars \u00fe\u00fa einnig skalt skera burt „<\/span>(Rm 11:22).<\/p>\n

Gu\u00f0 er alvarleg og g\u00f3\u00f0kynja vegna \u00feess a\u00f0 vera g\u00f6fugt, betri, e\u00f0a gott, sem undanskilur hvers konar \u00fevers\u00f6gn milli Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur og \u00fea\u00f0 \u00fej\u00e1st \u00ed heiminum.<\/p>\n

Ef gu\u00f0fr\u00e6\u00f0ingar yfir aldirnar hafa hunsa\u00f0 etymological r\u00f3t \u00e1 hugtakinu agathos ‘, vi\u00f0 erum uppi me\u00f0 spurninguna: hva\u00f0 \u00feeir ger\u00f0u vi\u00f0 hugtaki\u00f0’ Agape „, gr\u00edska or\u00f0inu \u00e1st?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gu\u00f0 er alvarleg og g\u00f3\u00f0kynja vegna \u00feess a\u00f0 vera g\u00f6fugt, betri, e\u00f0a gott, sem undanskilur hvers konar \u00fevers\u00f6gn milli Gu\u00f0 er g\u00f3\u00f0ur og \u00fea\u00f0 \u00fej\u00e1st \u00ed heiminum.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":75,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[15],"class_list":["post-13","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sem-categoria","tag-gud-er-godur"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/is\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/is\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/is\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/is\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/is\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/is\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/is\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/75"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/is\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/is\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estudosbiblicos.org\/is\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}